does core's current default mempool policy prevent tapscript inscriptions from being propagated?
it seems as long as mempool policy is the chosen battleground for value judgements of transactions, miners without scruples will consistently outperform the rest of the network through out of band processing. increasing the efficiency of a subset of miners is concerning in any circumstance.
in the last paragraph, is the point miners unwilling to mine transactions paying high enough fees will eventually not be economically viable if any other miners are consistently collecting those fees?
you cant expect the bitcoin network to provide value if you yourself don't run a node or a custodian holds your coins. 
Without savings how do you come to own a home? Trade your future labor to a bank to acquire a mortgage? Inflation is not a problem because we have an option to become indebted to a bank? surely I'm misunderstanding something here.
We can mine bitcoin by tying our private key to the string of a kite during a storm!
before nostr, pks just wanted to control utxos, now they can really be somebody.
Milk from a bag is fine.
"i can make nothing of it" -dr herzenstube
this is nice, i like this.







