False, Real G's move in silence like lasagna do you get it it's a play on words, the g in lasagna is silent
1) Sit down to construct the post that gives the greatest odds of drawing zaps
2) Realize that's what television, then social media did to us
3) Stand up to see what's going on outside
There is little to distinguish one social media company from another beyond window dressing and the feed algorithm. Any startup competitor can provide a platform to send messages with media to others, to post and display them publicly alongside otherwise private information.
So the social media corporation obsesses over its own coding that determines the post display order of your feed - generally giving preference to the desires of the advertisers who pay for space there.
The most ideal algorithm is one that is customized for the user, by the user -- not one presented without option.
The user has no incentive to view ads anymore when an ad-free alternative becomes available.
All this competition in creating the best secret algorithm recipe
is like wading in old bathwater.
Skip the bullshit and compete on creating the best tools for allowing users to choose how their own feeds will operate.
Build educational onramps and profitable parallel infrastructure rather than centralized closed-system walled gardens.
Protocols, not platforms.
True, there's always a bounty out there for new products, to the extent they meet needs in the market. Do I understand you correctly that your analogy is most pure when employees get paid only profitshare and/or coequity owners?
They would arise regardless. It doesn't matter much how the contracts are particularly arranged, but the density of them will approximate a local set of standards and customs that one might see in a village.
https://www.inoreader.com/ in theory, but Twitter in practice.
2D Threadbuilder wizard: Swipe to where you want to add a new message. Now either enter a new message or point to one on any platform to archive it.
This is the idea, except:
- Pinch/zoom to see grid overview, fullscreen post to read and swipe
- Swipe right to go to next post in thread, swipe down to see replies by author of thread to that post, then replies by others (2d grid)
#[0]
#[1]
#[2]
This is the thought I've been waiting for.
Will require drastic measures for any copyright troll types to maintain any say in derivatives now.
Paying the relay an extra incentive to efficiently send only posts that haven't been voted against in this way (my first thought is that this would end in disaster). Or just paying a satcounter and visible display service that serves data needed to auto-filter suppress-bountied posts. (interesting but not sure if better than just... filters with lots of knobs and levers).
- Accurately inform data collections as to preferences, more or less
- Create a curated list of posts that can be accessed by others
- Try to affect the algorithm / vote that 'people should see this post'
BTW There is virtue signal in reposts as well - a lot. Many people not reading beyond the headline, but saying 'this is what I believe!' or 'this is what I've been trying to say!' ... which is an okay and necessary social thing to do.
As for the solution, I guess I'd need to know, what was the need to distinguish reactions from replies from reposts?
Reaction:
post-type=reaction;content=':)'
Reply:
post-type=reply;content='Well said'
Repost:
post-type=repost;content='You might like this:'