Looks like that's kind of an epidemic around here. 🤔
That link (zap dot store) points to a shitcoin app. I don't think that's what you meant...?
Bitcoin challenges central banks. Always has been and always will. Anyone can use bitcoin for whatever they want, that's the purpose of it.
If we want hyperbitcoinization, everyone will have to use bitcoin anyway. In what order this needs to happen is not that important.
I only wish more plebs would own some, though.
Marriage is overrated.
Did the EO mention the word "bitcoin" though?
Estimated... So it's made up?
Why combine both variables (married, homeowners)? Seem unrelated.
Today many couples think formal marriage is overrated. I can't blame them, legally you can have the same by just signing a shared household contract. That didn't exist in the 50s. Besides the stigma of "oh, they live together but aren't married! 😳". Nobody cares nowadays.
I think there's interesting value by looking at the (presumed) decline of homeownership of 30yo, but combining that variable with marriedness seems pointless and distorts the otherwise interesting data beyond recognition.
If what you describe ever was to happen, it would be a matter of many decades, not just a few years. I think you're just very impatient and losing the plot about it.
Relax and stop comparing Bitcoin to shitcoins... Those are really designed for empty ptomises. Bitcoin already changed the world, and will continue to do so. And the world is 100% a better place with Bitcoin than without.
A salty shitcoiner for sure.
Most good bitcoiners know how to play the guitar. Don't ask me how I know. 🤷🏾♂️ 
Will they also buy the math co-processor, or are they only going to do only integer calculations with it?🤔
Not sure if you are testing someone or have a genuine need to ask those pretty obvious questions? 😅
If he really sold 80k BTC on the open market, and price dropped just 1.7%, that's bullish!
Also, if he really had that much BTC left, after his battle cries and menaces of selling all his BTC for BCH supposedly to crash the price of BTCUSD, isn't he kind of a hypocrite?🤔
But before AI, the "ideas guys" were helpless. Now they are armed and dangerous 😬
In the past we had Napster, Gnutella, eDonkey and BitTorrent. They did this for free, which is probably a bit less illegal than what you are proposing, but IANAL.
For all the noobs that can't handle "complicated" file-sharing, there's Cuevana and the likes. Sure, you could bolt streaming sats over LN on top of it, but these are centralized services and are being attacked and taken down regularly... Do you really want to enter that world?
Those that claim that a spam filter doesn't work while pointing at spam, are likely committing the survivorship bias fallacy...
... Or they could be gaslighting maybe? 🤔
Are spammers now extorting nostr users?
Btw... What about npubs with added PoW as checkmark or spam filter?🤔
Yes. But no high priority for now.
If nothing else, introduce new QC resistant signature scheme, disable rbf for old scheme and allow for one-time conversion of old UTXO's to new scheme. I guess something like that would always work.
For now... Just never reuse a spent address.
QC is still many decades away from whatever thing QC company claims is around the corner.
Chill 😉
Nice! If you printed the case yourself, can you share a link to the stl files?