Avatar
SuiGenerisJohn
67ada8e344532cbf82f0e702472e24c7896e0e1c96235eacbaaa4b8616052171
Interesting times. Dad, Husband, I mine fiat by practicing law. ⭕

Makes me think of your family story. Enjoy cowboy.

Untrue, in America you can sue anyone for anything I assure you. But can you win? That’s another question.

Doorknobs is a good burn.

nostr:note1r3wcupaczmy3w7gdyc5zyfx22sp3aefjy5hxfsdgsp8ag06vg0zsyc8ra8

I think he's slowly revealing he's been a bitcoiner all a long.

Some say I've got a great personality. Maybe I should take up the balaclava.

Replying to Avatar TheGrinder

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzqmn477tj8972x227pax2p77xawwv0xlgtwha644ax7pzpj5wae6wqydhwumn8ghj7mn0wd68yetvv9uju7t9va58ymewvdhk6tcpzemhxue69uhkummnw3ex2mrfw3jhxtn0wfnj7qpqwa3tqu84d02kjupk9wrfx73mtadjf9gn7lxeded7cvana3mp9s9s3t0p8s

Here are the key-points of the formal complaint filed this morning

---

Reasoning:

1. Violation of § 35 SGB XII – Accommodation and Heating

According to § 35 para. 1 SGB XII, the actual and reasonable costs for accommodation and heating must be covered. The rejection of the full heating cost back payment is based on a flat-rate consumption estimate which, in light of current economic realities, is no longer valid.

2. Improper Generalisation under § 36 SGB XII

Applying a flat benchmark of 167.4 kWh/m²/year without assessing local conditions or the individual living situation violates § 36 SGB XII. With utilities rising by 100% to 200% depending on provider, the use of outdated reference values is unjustified and unfit for the purpose.

3. Criticism of Wording under § 17 para. 1 SGB I – Duty of Clarification and Support

The statement in the notice that I should “review and adjust my heating behaviour” is a generalised and inappropriate moralising response. Under § 17 para. 1 SGB I, the authority is obliged to inform and support claimants factually, not to make disapproving insinuations or issue behavioural demands.

4. Violation of the Right to a Dignified Existence under § 9 para. 1 SGB XII

Refusing to cover the full amount of the heating back payment imposes an unreasonable financial burden and jeopardises my right to a minimum standard of living. As stated in § 9 para. 1 SGB XII, social assistance must guarantee a life in human dignity.

5. Conflict with the Purpose of Social Assistance under § 1 SGB XII

Social assistance, per § 1 SGB XII, exists to mitigate social disadvantage and prevent existential hardship. Using inflexible consumption formulas in the face of real inflation contradicts the fundamental goals of the welfare system.

Request:

I respectfully request full coverage of the outstanding utility back payment amount of €[AMOUNT] as listed in the 2025 utility bill and a correction of the decision dated 15 July 2025.

Please confirm receipt of this objection in writing and inform me of the timeframe for your decision.

---

Welcome to LAW.

Damn! Well written. Does this kind of complaint typically produce results? I’m not familiar with your system but what do you expect to happen now?

Why did I wake up at 4am?

Gotta stop the oceans from boiling.

I’m about to terrorize some steaks don’t tell them.

And touch sssssss aggressively.

I don’t mind people knowing I’m a lawyer but you assholes are making my CYA responses impossible due to the volume of retardation lol