Avatar
Keysa - Simplest Bitcoin Edu
6867d899ce6b677b89052602cfe04a165f26bb6a1a6390355f497f9ee5cb0796
🔸 Senior Editor: Bitcoin Art Magazine Primal.net/BitcoinArtMagazine 🔸 Author: The Simplest Bitcoin Book Ever Written 🔸 Free book download → http://simplestbitcoinbook.com Author :: 📙Download ‘The Simplest Bitcoin Book Ever Written’ - 2nd Ed. at simplestbitcoinbook.com 🧡 #plebchain 💜

Gn fam 💜

Sweet dreams

Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer electronic *cash* system

Thank you! 🙏💜🔥 nostr:note15cfhzgz4nd8va6ajprz9fnp5yf4jwtpv8a6sp33jknflkxg7suesfnjfat

Zapped by tapping the ⚡️icon under your note here on #damus

Weird thing is I went to fetch the screenshot to be sure it went through on my end and now coming back to this note to post the screenshot it no longer shows it was zapped (the ⚡️icon is clear again, not yellow), so idk but here’s the proof I sent:

Lol sorry Screenshot a mess got click on it

While I agree that anyone can choose who to start a family with, regardless of age *on either side*, I don’t know who considers 35 a geriatric pregnancy 😂 If it is the medical establishment, well then I trust that designation even less.

I know countless women who had kids after 35, and they are amazing moms and in healthy relationships.

Often the older moms are actually better moms in many ways, being more mature, more secure in themselves, more experienced in life and in relationship.

The bigger age gap you suggest also can becomes a huge issue later on when the women is just 45 and her husband is 70, or she is 55, still young, and he is 80.

All that aside, if a guy gets to 50 without a wife or kids, perhaps he needs to ask himself why? And once he becomes the person a woman wants to marry, perhaps think twice about purposely trying to put a young woman in a situation where she has a *true* geriatric as a husband when she is in the prime of her life, her 50s!

nostr:npub12rv5lskctqxxs2c8rf2zlzc7xx3qpvzs3w4etgemauy9thegr43sf485vg being cited in a paper by the guys who noticed Satoshi made a mistake in his calculations for the double spend race in the White Paper!

To be clear, Satoshi wasn’t far off so the results were not far off, but they published a paper with the corrected calculations here: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.02867.pdf

Upon looking at it, I see that they actually weren’t the first to notice! They base their paper on that of Rosenfeld, who wrote this paper on the subject in 2012/204: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1402.2009.pdf nostr:note1j2tl2me23874zy5t6r2wzm0v0h9mwpuawqyy7qvdtec62drf86qqtqpd03

Nice!! Ha those are the two guys who wrote a paper on how Satoshi had made a mistake in the White Paper in the calculations for the double spend race by an attacker!

Guy Swann’s takes are def some of the very best takes! nostr:note1xyq6vuhra6vy5nyytd2amkje7czyllyxwhc9x4um23lj8cd73p5qyuxjyx

Muun works well for that, but only for that, not for receiving your sats