The practical solution is a virtual machine that can schedule parts of your application across all your devices. Memory and compute intensive functions can be identified in realtime and pawned off on your desktop.
My trouble with guns is that they propose that conflict can be avoided by making every interaction potentially deadly. This does actually make a kind of sense, it is how the natural world works when it gave everyone fangs and claws.
But it is a low local maximum, Christianity proposes safety through sacrifice and love. It doesn't guarantee individual safety like violence claims, but it does, very slowly, create a world where violence is non-existent. Train your sons and daughters in love of God and neighbor and trust that better ideas will spread.
We've lost that trust that Christian ideals are better. It is the stupidest proposal to claim that they need to be protected through force. That only undermines the message.
This is the main problem with Bitcoin. It isn't shiny enough. Now if we could just make this alt-coin where the smallest divisible chunks are NFT images of procedurally generated gems...
"Lions for Breakfast" hands down. It's not even so bad it's good. It is just bad.
Cool. Thanks! I'll refrain from demanding vim motions for now.
I am curious if I am doing something wrong. Do the arrow keys and pgup pgdn work for scrolling? I have one of those track point mouse things on my laptop which makes scrolling a pain.
Conversion has always been easy with the roundest of numbers for me.
⚡ 0 = $0
Petnames for the win!
Ideaception - when a novel solution arises from misunderstanding.
More than once, though I can't remember specifics now, I have observed conversations where Person A asks Person B for help solving a problem. Person B makes a bad suggestion that Person A misunderstands. What Person A thinks Person B said is actually a really good idea that neither party would never have thought of in a million years.
Where did the idea come from?
Are there other sorts of requests that are arriving out of order that require an open connection to be processed? Does the close connection request give any indication of how many to expect?
I have to admit I am confused, but if you get a disconnect request from a client for which there is no established connection you can increment a disconnect counter in a mutex then whenever you complete a connect check for a positive disconnect counter, disconnect, and decrement.
If there is an established connection as indicated by a connection counter in the mutex then disconnect right away. It's kind of like counting parentheses.
I guess I am confused as to how they could overlap. Are you waiting on a handshake? Is this Aedile?
Are these out of order connect/disconnect requests from the same client?
I am assuming this is on the server side not the app side? So you want to read the udp socket on one thread and then pass the packet to worker threads based on connection status?
I understand. However, we aren't seeing wildly different content, you find it engaging and the people who don't stick around don't. I am positing that, just maybe, the good mornings, Bitcoin evangelism, and health advice aren't nearly a deep as generally held.
There are great conversations here, no one here is stupid, but they occur deep in reply threads on topics outside the mainstream nostr fare. I remain for the potential of the technology and for those rare moments that people let their deeply held beliefs on the nature of being shine.
People are wonderfully complicated and nearly everyone has fascinating history and insights, thing they have pondered or experienced in depth. What are yours?
This badge conversation is actually a good example. I don't usually engage with your notes, but this one strikes a chord, because you have noted something deep and fundemental about online engagement. I happen to disagree that chasing dopamine is a net good. (It works too well on me so I hate it) But I am glad that people are willing to try things that I don't like. I might be wrong and if left to me many wonderful things might go untried.
So keep up posting wild curious ideas that you have thought seriously about and more people will stick around, even if just to disagree.
No. Nostr doesn't have horrible retention for lack of dopamine, it has horrible retention for lack of engaging notes.
Notes are largely self-congradulatory and lack anything like real insight. Luckily we don't need insights, or diet advice, we need genuine curiosity and humility about the universe outside of Bitcoin.
This goes for me as well. I am not a humble person and it reflects in how much engagement I get.
You need to invest it in Satoshi stocks.