Avatar
Cyber Seagull
77953b3a63bcf1c748dbdeef109bd56de48c30edcd27d2092440c3adca31c975
Tiramisu. God. Bitcoin. Drivechain. In that order.

Look into it https://drivechain.xyz/

It's a way to extend bitcoin without threatening the mainchain slowness and stability we all love.

Yeah....it would be better for them to be slaving away in rice fields. /s

That's not how DC works though. A successful project on DC might be vulnerable but not bitcoin. To miners and bitcoin its just another hash block. Blind merged minning is already bitcoin core by the way. Your premise requires miner censorship, which is not and has not been successful now despite years of attempts.

If you would read Pauls years of work on DC, you would see that DC actually increases security. More profits for miners secures the network, more... that's the way satoshi designed it. In addition, more miners entering the space means a larger physical lobby against gov interference (Matt Kratter).

Nah. I've calculated that all the time spent trying to prevent death, would take away from my life.

I bet there is no word for a lake that hangs above the ocean though.

Here's hoping people revolution in the correct direction this time. Probably won't.

A kite would be way safer and accomplish the exact same functionality, if not better.

So Mastodon vs. Nostr.

Replying to Avatar preston

Drivechains

Alright people, we are playing a game of chess here. The one thing, the absolute one thing, we can't do is give up the king. To give up the king, in my humble opinion, is to mess up the base layer. This mistake would disrupt the delicate incentive structure that ensures sound money. That sound money pegs the extremely fragile credit markets and out-of-control G7 policymakers that are creating clown world with their CB fiat policies.

We don’t need the sound, pegged, money to move fast, we don’t need the money to do smart swoopty things, we just need it to be pegged, immutable, and digitally sailable to actually stop the madness of clown world.

By introducing a whole lot of technical complexity to the base layer and potentially screwing with the incentives all so we can connect to a bunch of centralized shitcoin projects is like playing offense with the king when you’re down 7 pieces and the other player still has their entire back row at their disposal.

A. Why the rush!?

B. Why not just go use Monero if you need that level of anominity in your transactions. Why do you have to have it in a wrapper via drivechains?

C. Why risk the king without deep understanding and testing of the technical risk and potential change to incentives?

The beauty of Bitcoin is you can build it and softfork it, and we’ll let the community vote with their nodes. BUT, I for one, have no use for drivechains (that doesn’t mean everyone is like me). And as a result, I will not be updating my node and running any attempted “secret” softfork updates by the miners.

Chess is not even the same game it once was.

Chess is not real life, with chance accidents and real world discoveries of new technologies.

Not only is your comparison unfit, it ignores a better one. Ecology.

Bitcoin exists in a competive jungle and you are arguing for overspecialization in the fastest moving environment in human history, software.

I doubt you will read this, but drive chain allows a slow main chain and second layer innovation. The orthodox tradition and youthful iconclasm, both.