This can become an interesting market, a user is willing to pay 1k sats/year for his file to be hosted, 1 server accepts it, a second one comes along, so now it's 500 sats to each one, if the split value get too low no more servers will appear, some can even pull out, but there will be a equilibrium ans maybe you have enough redundancy for your file, if it's not enough you have to increase your budget. Servers will constantly compete for a share of your payment, they will compete to provide a service for you and they would be able to see all the competition, it's like bitcoin miners fighting for the block reward.

I feel like I looked into this but can’t remember what it was. Can someone give me the TL;DR on Blossom for when I come back to check on this? 😁 nostr:note1609rh6qd7te9tagenmklel8c0jrqdj2rp00ssw8punl2cmastqjszzyj8u

Yo #monero bro's.......hearing you change your tune on being hardcore ungovernable to now saying KYC monero is a safe option is the lamest thing I've heard in a long time

We had a phenomenal meetup today. People asked a lot of questions, got answers and received sats.

The awareness of the orange coin is spreading.

I love building on nostr. I can just think of an idea for a way to interact with nostr and implement it.

No need to ask for permission or buy api credits to some system that can shut me out.

nostr not only affords unrestricted and uncensorable speech for all, but it also enables us devs to build whatever we want without restrictions. It is flexible enough to build tons of new experiences that all interoperate.

Twitter clients are just the tip of the iceberg. Admittedly a very cool usecase that I’m still focused on, but a desktop client has a lot more real estate which I plan to take advantage of to explore more interesting interactions. nostr:note1z9a794kfqku057nrwd87kar4xy97jdf3vl9llmcluf745agrf6ps9gj9gg

People lie about anything and everything and it's the strangest thing.

“It turns out there’s a very clear reason for [why no one who had once worked at OpenAI was talking]. I have seen the extremely restrictive off-boarding agreement that contains nondisclosure and non-disparagement provisions former OpenAI employees are subject to. It forbids them, for the rest of their lives, from criticizing their former employer. Even acknowledging that the NDA exists is a violation of it.

If a departing employee declines to sign the document, or if they violate it, they can lose all vested equity they earned during their time at the company, which is likely worth millions of dollars. One former employee, Daniel Kokotajlo, who posted that he quit OpenAI “due to losing confidence that it would behave responsibly around the time of AGI,” has confirmed publicly that he had to surrender what would have likely turned out to be a huge sum of money in order to quit without signing the document.”

Says the greater fool.

Take a minute to look at this and hit the like button if you understand or hit the reply button for questions..!

Coercive tools of the government

Digital ID

CBDC

KYC

AML

Inflation

Debt

Taxation

Licensing and Permits

Mass Surveillance

Data Collection

Censorship

Gun Control

Vaccination

Travel Restrictions

Social Credit Systems

Compulsory Education

False Flag

PsyOps

Did I miss some?

👇

This is my thinking too. If you are a nation state, and want users to distrust the network, why not just spin up a bunch of miners to attack it and/or regulate white markets?

More direct and easier to attack than 1) trying to figure out if a double spend bug even exists in the first place and 2) secretly double spending low amounts slowly over time that would have virtually no affect on price which means no users would even know. If it isn't enough to change anything does it really matter?