lnbc89640n1p377qhfpp5jvekqgrm30jd9vx94tjz4xlvnrp5vngdk4g9hqnd9gdjcp2dgazqdqu2askcmr9wssx7e3q2dshgmmndp5scqzpgxqyz5vqsp5l2myuj8je4twur6phkpafat7a8d97pffffghfkc7nn04sj4tssnq9qyyssqmprztlexj5z3jdnh6ml5wnx985wewkc7mwhvm484myengvm4yhergd2cdlycrgsnhn9drney4tnva2jza6fv76lehrvsnfvglw4t6scp458k4s
lnbc1p37a7ehpp54hgvu9tu3fsp97cav7ryn6np8dl9gr88szay787ajrsp9fdgfwesdqu2askcmr9wssx7e3q2dshgmmndp5scqzpgxqyz5vqsp5g97j43c7hvmrx5j704mynzrprwcq98628eusak208942rrndn9qq9qyyssqdfpjnq9v7fl4vmewlaezytmau992vp34x2qkeual35n7j289kulsdu8374f98z2e0g7yjnl4y96wa4mxv5vpt74jg8y2n3sfzvfq9pcpc804gp
Amazed to see what I post from my Damus App can’t appear on Iris webpage and vice versa! Anyone else has this same issue?
I ’d like to select a paid relay for a facilitated writing and spreading, so would you like to support me by zapping me 8964 and help me to achieve this?
(I can’t see my previous note, so post this one again)
lnbc89640n1p37atawpp5g5qs7rapg9cjwher0tnrzllu6vsj89fymkzzc05kj87q4k2lt6jqdqu2askcmr9wssx7e3q2dshgmmndp5scqzpgxqyz5vqsp5u5g92f7d2mhasdpmrluqq5xtk6xtcw8lzjp78jufl3n3qh8nnags9qyyssqlt2l7d0zzy894y27tawwcvmwgkd68v560exv2myp2j7ea6572j3yx545qdmnghzq37nmv990eegq0gtmt5r8lgdcps9vfhtqa6kjxhsqftar2n
Which paid relay do you like most? Why?
#基本概念 （3）：自由
政治哲学意义上的自由最早来自约翰•洛克的《政府论》，它说，如果完全不受到任何约束的人可能因为与他人发生的各种纠纷而需要有一个公共的执行机构来充当公正的中间方以保护自己的话，那么他们就必须要结合起来，组成社会，然后组建这样一个公正的中间方机构，然后，人们把自己对纠纷的个人执行权交给这个机构。但成立这个机构前，为防止这个机构在获得了所有人授予的权力之后就欺压大家，因此他们必须先制定一个公共的契约以确保这个代表公正的执行人不会侵犯每个个人原有的自由。这就是政治哲学上的自由，也就是今天的现代自由社会所说的自由。自由是对政府行为进行的各种限制，以防止政府滥用权力来欺压人民，换句话说，它所针对的是政府行为。
在这方面，中国人面临两大误解：1. 认为政府是管老百姓的，而不是保护老百姓的。因此，当政府号称”xxx不是法外之地“时，人们认为这是正常的，甚至当政府“管不过来”时，普通人有责任要去管那些道德品行不端者。但自由社会存在极多的法外之地，因为政府的行为是受限的，许多地方它就是不能管、管不到，而这才有了自由；而中国这个没有任何法外之地的国家就是典型的极权主义国家。2.认为自由存在着道德门槛，也就是只有好人、符合道德标准的人才配享有，坏人不得享有。但如果把道德带进政治，最终将使每个个人都失去自由。虽然你或许可以很快意地去大声斥责某个人道德品行不端，但道德是含糊不清的，而法律则最忌讳含糊其辞，可以使政府任意解读和运用法律，打压个人，剥夺他们的自由。这也就是滥用权力、侵害人权的结果。例如，维护权利（正利）的人可能因为其行为不被政府所容就被以模糊不清的、没有定义的罪名打压（如寻衅滋事罪）；相反那些真正危害公共安全的人，却可以在同样的法律之下，凭借官方给予的道德名誉（如先进分子）成为公众偶像或领导人，而其实他们可能就是危害公共安全或秩序的罪犯，但的道德不轨甚至犯罪却不会导致他们受任何惩罚，连道德谴责都没有（如张高丽性侵女运动员）。
所以，当谈到自由的时候，不要马上联想到如何解除对个人行为的限制，而必须要去思考如何限制政府的行为，并必须承认每个个人享有平等的自由。一旦你设置享受自由的道德条件并试图剥夺坏人的自由时，你的自由也必定在这个过程中彻底丧失。
Basic concept (3): freedom
When we talk about freedom, we mean constitutional and legal restrictions on government behaviors. However, Chinese government always claim “there’s no loophole for anything in laws”, which means the government has the right to control everything, subsequently, people believe where the government can’t control something, people have the duty to control it based on the “common” morality rules to stand up for the “righteousness” by criticizing or even punishing morally “bad” people, behaviors, or thoughts. Thus, while people yearn for freedom, they cannot accept that freedom should be equally extended to all, including the “immoral” or even criminals.
wow，89 is the number I often use alongside 64. I have announced to zap 64 if I like some note. So I’m going to zap you for this great idea.
lnbc890n1p37uq24pp5lpllu7gl5dyxtcqs2t777erajv9envt0c088mjqv3vcmhcjpvg9qdqu2askcmr9wssx7e3q2dshgmmndp5scqzpgxqyz5vqsp58xh0xvnjga7w6fzv89jd9zcdeazrsuchn4xy3ppkkfwuk8ut58eq9qyyssq7xjzpuqgl7z2deyvvyupldc9amv9y5vyznne59tgt3ta2k3vlcx4gg5wnpk595h44zz89n5tt24hrhhhen6wga9v90h8c2zpfp3aq2gpdvr9k3
好像Iris会丢失帖子？。Is it true that some notes get lost after posting on Iris? The note below is apparently gone.
https://iris.to/post/note12cy072rnlejsw3dkmqm8qqpflp6kak7df8wvtp5w3jc6kzh4ptksff969w
看不见了
Concern of losing a whole thread of 3 notes of a translation:
I understand that early stage of a platform may have many glitches, but what I do not quite get is the disappearance of this thread of notes, which is a translated version of the original in English. Such kind of things I've done a lot, including translation of BBC radio programs, banned on YouTube, for which I contacted BBC for assistance. I'd not consider this as violation of property rights, because I'm not earning any benefit from such activities. Yet, I still get just this thread of posts lost from the platform, which imposes a sense of insecurity in me because it seems like the censorship that have been doing harm to all the people in China. I assume it should not happen in decentralized platform, but other than censorship, I can't find a better way to understand this incidence. Attached is the snapshot from a legacy page, which had just erased the opening post of the thread with 2 following posts still on.
But I really hope I was wrong.
好像Iris会丢失帖子？。Is it true that some notes get lost after posting on Iris? The note below is apparently gone.
https://iris.to/post/note12cy072rnlejsw3dkmqm8qqpflp6kak7df8wvtp5w3jc6kzh4ptksff969w
看不见了
Even though I've blocked a lot this time, it doesn't synchronously change elsewhere. What's the problem?
我删除和拉黑了很多，这一次，但是这些变化都没有在其他的平台上同步。怎么回事呢？
但有趣的是，虽然马克思当年的资本论连找个人付印都找不到，他还希望向他的亲戚（菲利普公司创始人家族的一个人）借钱印刷，而梅恩的书却十分畅销，因为当时的英国人都感觉印度最终会走向独立的道路，因此人们都希望寻找一个比较好的途径来面对印度未来的独立。
但马克思在自己的著作中骂梅恩是傻子、蠢货，然而今天人们已经知道了究竟谁是傻子和蠢货。
中国人一向觉得马克思主义是好的是追求理想的（其实因为中国人不具备批判性思维能力，这是需要学习才能掌握的），问题只是后来的人把理论弄歪了。这是不对的。这就是为什么我要花时间翻译耶鲁大学教授的讲课的原因，我希望这样的误解不要再继续下去了。马克思主义的理论全部都是基于道德批判的，而道德批判，连马克思本人都知道，是不符合学术要求的。所以马克思主义原则上不是什么科学著作，无论是哲学还是政治经济学。而他号称是科学研究的成果，所以我们可以说，马克思主义就是伪科学。
我被⚡️了第21笔zap——21 Sats！非常感谢这位达友！！
Happy to be zapped 21 Sats, my 21 supporter. Thanks very much for the Damussant (Sorry, the word is coined by me)!
Basically, my answer to this question is: The future of China lies in the hands of Chinese people, whether they will rise up to actions, as you may observe my efforts in this regard, but it has to be coordinated efforts of many people in great unity. People’s power collectively overwhelms the government’s force by hundreds of times, however, if you have learned the ploy of custodial policy to prevent people from unionization from Suntzu’s Strategies of War, you will know that even though people collectively make way stronger power than the government’s force, as long as people are not mobilized, the state power is always the dominating force amongst everything. Therefore, it’s not a matter of prediction but whether people have the confidence and resolve to rise up.