it's about as funny as making jokes about pedos if you ask me

Haha! Well it definitely is an effect out there. I don't know whether that effect is stronger or weaker than it used to be, or how many of the cases of women being gay are caused by an impression of the available men less desirable than what they would prefer. I would guess it has gone up. Also low expectations of men from father figures or lack thereof.

You'd have to split things up a lot further to have any strong evidence for something specific like that.

🥹

Ok, now how many of those are just LGB?

They really hate diversity, don't they? Trying to lump everyone into the same group.

It's a fun way to make little prototypes.

What do you want of a nostr desktop app?

Yes, but IP addresses don't have your face on them

Think of them as using bitcoin as their bank which is what it is for. Simply when they need to spend in any way they can use coinjoin or lightning or other methods.

Thinking through groups on nostr for communities that put a premium on privacy, and I'm not sure it's going to work.

You can get privacy of communication via relay authentication or encryption. But a starting point for identifying each other is to publish a public profile, which might not be desirable. And you might want to use your real name in a community, but not in public.

I'm just imagining asking a little old lady in my church (assuming she can get past the cryptographic key pair step) to permanently publish her name and picture to 8 billion people on the internet in order for her to get access to announcements about after-church potlucks. It just doesn't make any sense.

Having a single profile for your online identity violates the "selective revelation of self" principle. Even if you use different keys for different things, you ideally are only going to want to share your profile with certain people.

A possible solution to this is encryption-by-default. Only send your profile to the people and communities you want to reveal yourself to, AKA the Google+ circles model.

Have I been barking up the wrong tree this whole time? I know some people have said "nostr is for public data". I still don't completely believe this, but it's harder to work against the grain than I expected.

EU has 13% higher tarrifs on USA then the other way around.

So dear #eulag overlords, shut the fuck up about trade war and lower (or abolish) them.

Trump will not raise theirs.

here is an example of the obtuse nature of most "devs" especially those heavily involved in javascripting

can you read any explanation for why these fields in the "kinds" object fields in this "retention" key are an array of arrays exactly

so, just for funsies, let's mix it up so we have an array that has fields that are arrays of arrays as well as simple integers

why? just why?

javascript is poison for the mind, and here's the proof in the total lack of explanation for the need to support arrays of integeres as well as arays because there seems to be ZERO semantics suggested as to why

but ok, i will put both in, because fuck you that's why

#beerstr what a time to be alive

Holy shit Proton Wallet

Why do women need to show off? Because genetically they are programmed to do so, to attract the male.

This is an example of paleopthinking or paleophilosophy. We are still animals, apply paleo logic to everything and you will understand many things and above all you will eat better.