Avatar
Haroun Kola
895ce7896200c35fa7c883f3caec4b1a85a42da0494b7c4b0e3a411671738b7e
Livestreaming as I discover Nostr and working towards Bitcoin Adoption in South Africa

Partout dans le monde, nous devons parler de ces sujets. Et utilisez ces protocoles.

Oh hahaha. I thought it was a globe.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

As developed nations continue to enter sovereign debt crises akin to the 1940s, there are a few main outcomes.

Option 1) In a world without bitcoin, or if bitcoin fails, central banks and their governments recapitalize themselves with gold, devalue the people, and do another cycle of this inflationary policy for the next few generations. The Treasury/Fed handbook literally has a written option for this, although it is stated more opaquely. It can be done in the US (and probably many other countries) based on current laws if shit hits the fan. Denmark's central bank and China's economic ministers have also written similar things regarding extreme outcomes. It's pretty straightforward based on the past.

Option 2) We go into a centralized technocratic future. Centralized AI and CBDCs win. People have cuck money that the AI+government control. It's like Brave New World, 1984, take your pick. Hard to say, but not free.

Option 3) Open source money wins. Bitcoin and its ecosystem win. Governments get defunded from their fiat printers, and have to be more honest with their ledgers or default and get reconstructed since they can't print what their people hold as savings, or in the hegemon's case, can't print what the world holds. Probably a world of chaos for a time during the transition, but also an opportunity for peace and building the next era. Keeping track of the nukes would probably be a big deal, like when the Soviet Union fell. It's actually kind of remarkable that they collapsed economically and politically but in an orderly enough way to keep track of and secure most of the nukes.

I don't know which one will win, but I consider Option 3 to be the honorable method; the path of transparency. That's the one I am rooting for and building for.

If I fail, I would like it written that it's the method I tried for, but realistically the AI+government will probably delete most of the records of all of the failures anyway, since that is how history works, without any sort of objective truth keeper. Our best hope is to hide records in a distributed way and hope they can remain undisturbed for a while. At least bitcoiners have a tendency to write stuff in steel and make low time preference things. Some psychopath will hopefully carve a life work in steel in a cave or something, but who knows, lol.

And ironically, if Option 3 wins, any of the losing factions could still insert their ideas and paths into the Bitcoin blockchain, now or in the future. It's the most immutable database that we know how to build, and would preserve their ideas as it does our ideas. Like, you know what? I *want* the Communist Manifesto to be in the immutable Bitcoin blockchain, because I want people in the future to know how *bad* it is. It might already be in there; I don't know. I wouldn't want people centuries from now to think about those ideas and believe they came up with something new; I want to preserve my enemies' texts because I believe I can win through markets, force, virtue, and truth.

I think that's almost always what determines the winning side. Losers want to burn their enemies' texts to ensure that their good ideas don't spread too much. Winners want to preserve their enemies' texts to ensure that their bad ideas are never repeated.

It's why I leave my bad takes public as well (my shotcoinint days).

It reminds me of how easily I can be lead astray.

...

Replying to Avatar StackSats.IO

nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a posted a good thread on Xitter about Satoshi and the origins of Bitcoin and the replies are full of muppets saying it’s CIA..

How many AnCaps do you think work for the CI fucking A? The answer is Zero. None.

No-one who believes in a voluntary society is going to work for the alphabet agency responsible for literally dozens of coups, thousands of assassinations, and millions of deaths in wars and drug trafficking. Certainly not such a brilliant mind as Satoshi who could have made fortunes in the private sector.

This wasn’t a teenage vegan putting aside their preferences to work at McDonalds for min wage - this was a genius dedicating free time to an open source project done the right way to subvert the entire global economic system.

And there is no doubt Satoshi was AnCap, whether he’d have used that word to describe himself is another story, but his worldview is definitely aligned and he was clearly well versed in that philosophy else he wouldn’t have created a decentralised currency outside of the State and went to such great lengths to keep himself anonymous such that it could survive beyond him.

It’s just more cope from the loser brigade who want bag-pumping crypto scams to be front and centre because once the story of Bitcoin is known, people grok that it is the Zero to One. They see the history it was built upon and the confluence of factors that led to Bitcoin’s discovery and then there is no unseeing it, down the rabbit hole you go..

People grok onto Bitcoin when they're ready. Price and adoption. Eventually all will when there's no other choice.

Replying to nobody

Done!

Thanks. I'll hold or pass on to onboard others.

Last block was a palindrome

More fear porn about what our country is going through.

Hoping for a decentralised revolution I to a better world

https://youtu.be/wqC-3WUpF5s?si=z6bJmtI9NYRe48yw

It starts with you zapping the heaven into this post.