Avatar
Viktor Vsk
8a699686811889186df398c7253e8c4417ce73fe814edeae7ecd81dbde9536ac
Building #saltivka šŸ‡ŗšŸ‡¦ Nostr Friendly Relay (https://saltivka.org) Building #Knowstr — smart Nostr events aggregator (https://github.com/viktorvsk/knowstr) Working to enable people have more activities through the word of mouth between friends, friends of friends and more šŸ¤ with https://recar.io and https://valent.network

Adsense works because you trust google and google constantly ā€œchecks resultsā€ - it moderates ads, runs fraud detection, bans bots and scrapers from google search etc etc etc. so basically its googles killer feature how to check the results and its closed sourced

It can be called performance metrics too, yes, but those metrics should be evaluated by one who receives sats imo. Or do you think its just a payer who has to validate results and decide if they want to continue working or better find another service provider?

If its upto payer then how you protect from the basic form of fraud like ā€œsaying I finished work for every incoming taskā€? You want to assign scores using web of trust and limit the usage of your app to those who have rating above X?

Lets say I want to pay 100k sats for labeling of 1000 nostr notes. I send sats to you somehow since you hosting the app, correct?

Then your app show this order as ā€œready for workā€ or something. And then participants can take that order in work. They can constantly stream their progress and once they reach 1000 they get automatically paid

The thing is, if my assumption is correct that you get sats because you host the app, then you must validate workers results to maintain your reputation. There are probably infinite ways on how to validate, simplest are like:

1) KYC workers on sign up to check their skills etc and if customers complain, figure it out with workers what was wrong

2) once worker submitted score 1000 validate actual results for instance by manually scanning random 100 records and penalize worker if errors found

And in this case its a very interesting system however the main killer feature part is validation. Do you have any specific ideas on validation flows or you have different priorities for now?

It seems to me its just your (and may this guys followers) interpretation if this term isn’t it?

Because if he would actually write what he means it would stop being clickbait and appeared to be meaningless, see:

Show me a person who believes the problem can be solved with more irresponsible and uncontrolled printing of money which end up at small group pockets and I’ll …

Compare to:

Show me a person who believes the problem can be solved with responsible distribution of money across vital social institutes i.e military, healthcare, post delivery to far rural areas in order to achieve democracy principles and I’ll …

That what clickbait means. That how narrative manipulation on internet looks like. This guy is a poor bitcoin promoter, I’m sad to be on the same side with such a guy

No offends but its very sad there are no bitcoin promoters who can hold basic levels of critics after bitcointalk era ended around 2011

So you understand that you want to support military right? I also think you understand its hella expensive. Do you suggest direct volunteer funding of military with bitcoin donations?

I don’t have an answer to how this should work. I’m just sure it makes no sense discussing complete govt and removal without prior understanding of how to protect yourself from external threat at least. Unfortunately I had to learn it hard way on my own experience

That while bitcoin is important, its not the fight between you and govt

My point is we have to reshape our govts to work with bitcoin. And not remove govts to be able to freely work with bitcoin. Because we are govt at the end of the day

I often see bitcoin promoters who want 100% bitcoin free life, no inflation, no taxes. But then they forget all govt gives them and takes that for granted. And also they don’t want to think how can bitcoin without govts and military protect them from barbarians who divide and concur (and unfortunately they still ecost)

English is indeed my 2nd language and I may very well be wrong here. I just see every message of this author to be a clickbait which is at best debatable due to wording and at worst is strict lies

So tell me please, is it lexically incorrect to say that manipulating self hosted bitcoin node in a skillful manner I can send money through the mixer to hide its origins?

So lets say you are pro in terms of allowing other parents do w/e shit they want to their kids (I do, I’m against those devices but I think if one wants to attach it to their kid, they must be able to)

And your device that blocks camera etc is gonna take such possibility out of those people. Thats just demonstration of why democracy is complex and mot everything has an easy solution and ā€œits just they who are badā€

No, you are very wrong and you don’t understand anything on this topic but already do an analysis.

rusians goals are not achieved. Their goals are not a land corridor, not Crimea, not even entire Ukraine and not even USSR resurrection

Their goal is to become a superpower it once was (in their minds) without actually behaving any laws. You then think where their goals end. And don’t forget they border with US too