About as well as your rape analogy, but I have a feeling that you are not able to understand what I mean.
Intellectual property rights are protected the same way, the Mafia protects your store.
But you are not only trying to argue that the Mafia business model is legit, you think it doesn’t go far enough.
Nothing you said is true according to international IP laws.
Sorry, it can’t be rape that word was trademarked by Epstein LLC.
Oh, but he does. You are confusing copyright and brands.
And copyright he gave up freely by encouraging sharing the whitepaper explicitly in his emails.
LOL. So the already logically impossible ip laws are not enough, now every word is property of the first person to use it 😂
You’re so funny… satoshi was able to write to Cypherpunks from a email address to this day not traced to a person, but somehow it was censored?
And on top of that he wanted to protect a brand that he didn’t register 😂
So? Even if I roll with the ridiculous concept of current ip laws, Satoshi did not register a brand, the word is widely used on common language -> cannot be protected as a brand
So, if Satoshi was not the involved in the publishing on GitHub and consented to the MIT license… why did he never oppose it?
He has plenty of time before he disappeared, since it’s been on there since 2009y
So who owns the term Bitcoin then?
P.S. see how ridiculous the concept of IP is? Trying to own a word. Trying to ban billions of people from speaking freely, because somebody supposedly owns their tongues.
Go check the terms of MIT license, please.
You can’t own an idea 🤷
It’s not scarce.
In fact, to claim IP you need to claim ownership of other person’s thought, words and bodies.
IP is slavery.
Slight problem for your thesis:
You can never take it back once you opensource something.
Another slight problem:
If you want to claim ownership of an IP, you need to prove it in court.
But a meter is not flexible. Just imagine if the tree you are measuring grows. How do you measure the tree once it is taller than a meter?
No, no. We need a tree committee that sets the length of the meter based on the current tree growing season.
And then we need tree bank companies to give additional centimeters to tree growers who run out of meters.
I sincerely hope he‘ll at least have fun staying poor.
Not only that. Hoppe explains very well how the only way to enforce intellectual property is by making another person‘s body, thought and speech subordinate to your Ip.
It’s a particularly insidious form of slavery.
No. The purpose of the zap is to interact. Obfuscation of the sender by default breaks the whole concept.
Anon zaps as option is perfect.
But that’s my opinion. Go build a client that has it as a default.
This hurts my brain…
Also intellectual property isn’t property, it’s a fraudulent concept from the get go.
He deserves it.
And tbh if the Winklevoss twins had not played all these games, but just given every Bitcoin builder a billion Sats, they’d be much richer in the long run.
Still to much Fiat mindset even with those who own trillions of Sats
Best two have two of your own nodes, connected via private channel.
Send from one node to other, than either on chain or rotate it between no-KYC custodial wallets for a little extra work for any tracker, then submarine swap out.