Avatar
roll_the_dice
912e6bdc5ef0d6583287b0d8c9bf2f396afaa565c558f06d39a8f963c63df60a
The issue which has swept down the centuries and which will have to be fought sooner or later is the people versus the banks.

make mining more decentralized, not less.

Replying to Avatar Crizzo

Knots people don't want to relay transactions they consider spam from their nodes. However having filters on their personal nodes can't actually stop it so it's mostly symbolic (they might disagree with this).

Core is removing the filters because it creates friction in the network. It gives large miners an advantage as they have the resources to build systems that accept spam transactions directly for higher fees, reducing the competitiveness of smaller miners and contributing to mining centralization. Also people that run filters will be at a disadvantage when calculating fees from their own mempools because they won't know about the spam transactions. Additionally removing filters disincentivizes other novel and potentially harmful ways of embedding data like custom addresses that contain the data in the address string.

People feel they are being forced into this change by core and don't want to give up the option to set local mempool policy on their nodes. Core is by far the most dominant implementation and having a small group of devs making these decisions is concerning. Questions have arisen about conflicts of interest that are totally valid, and resulted in bans on the GitHub discussion of those expressing those concerns. Censoring opposition is not a good look and turned many people against the core devs, and also caused the conflict to spill out across other social media.

That's about the gist of it. I've been following this as closely as a pleb like me can. I was against core at first, but I've come around to their arguments and think the stability and smooth functioning of the network is more important. Filtering spam at the node level is ineffective and creates unintended consequence that are harmful to the network. Also even though I call it spam, there is potential for useful L2 stuff to be created that furthers bitcoins mission as well.

I think all nodes will have messed up fee calculation if they bypass the p2p network and go straight to the large miners

Voting is supposed to be a pressure release in a democracy. If they are blocking the release, we must ask why they are trying to build up the pressure. Presumably to direct it towards an external war, enabling large scale money printing and asset seizures to bail out the bankers... again.

Pretty sure the EU has no way to stop people using privacy coins, that's literally the whole point. It's like they're desperate to prove to the world that they are powerless.

We don't know what forces were created at its inception, we can't go back the far with experiments.

We can go back to the point where electromagnetism and the weak force were combined into a single electroweak force.

Also, gravity is not really considered a force, but the bending of spacetime in response to matter/energy.