Avatar
hodlbod
97c70a44366a6535c145b333f973ea86dfdc2d7a99da618c40c64705ad98e322
Christian Bitcoiner and developer of coracle.social. Learn more at info.coracle.social. If you can't tell the difference between me and a scammer, use a nostr client with web of trust support.

Relays don't have to store in a db, be limited to one AZ, or serve over websockets. It would also be easy to support imgproxy syntax as part of the spec. A relay is just a server, anything a server can do a relay can too. The benefit is access to >1 image server with the same API.

That said, you're right that moderation (or at least operator willingness to take responsibility for what they're hosting) is a hard requirement. This is a much bigger ask than for regular relays, it's ok if we have big operators here IMO.

Yeah, there are a bunch of proposals out, I've sort of lost track

Yep, but better than nostr devs going to jail on CSAM charges. Hopefully it will be temporary.

I'm ready to stop hosting Coracle's user uploads. I know about nostr.band's API, does void.cat have one? Any other providers I should consider? I do intend to use relays for storage once that spec is finalized, but for now I need to stop hosting whatever.

Fantastic conversation on understanding identity politics in America. Covers race, gender, economics, and of course theology.

https://thetheologypugcast.com/index.php/2023/08/21/episode-249-identity-politics-original-sin-an-interview-with-dr-joshua-mitchell/

Replying to Avatar brugeman

nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn I'd like to reuse your relay reviews approach on nostrapp.link for app reviews.

I see you're using [["L","social.coracle.ontology"],["l","review/relay","social.coracle.ontology","{\"quality\":1}"]

Should I create a separate ontology? Or just use review/app label? Any suggestions?

No, please borrow mine (or let me know what you end up using). Ontologies aren't meant to be app specific, just clear. I should probably have made that more clear in the nip.

Yes, and to an extent many will block illegal content. But that's distinct from allowing individuals to block whomever

Mastodon is federated (many-centered), not decentralized. Relays can block stuff here too, but a relay blocking something does not block that thing for its users, unless they only use that relay.

Spam is (partly) solved by muting, because they want your attention, and you can simply deny them that using various tools for classifying content as undesirable. Harassment isn't solved by muting because they want other people's attention as well as yours.

But yes, Christian relays can (and should) block porn.