Does picsur have moderation tools? I wouldn't mind using an existing product or protocol as long as relays can recommend a good service provider
Relays don't have to store in a db, be limited to one AZ, or serve over websockets. It would also be easy to support imgproxy syntax as part of the spec. A relay is just a server, anything a server can do a relay can too. The benefit is access to >1 image server with the same API.
That said, you're right that moderation (or at least operator willingness to take responsibility for what they're hosting) is a hard requirement. This is a much bigger ask than for regular relays, it's ok if we have big operators here IMO.
Yeah, there are a bunch of proposals out, I've sort of lost track
Yep, but better than nostr devs going to jail on CSAM charges. Hopefully it will be temporary.
Nostr Talks: learning about the Nostr Browser by nostr:npub1xdtducdnjerex88gkg2qk2atsdlqsyxqaag4h05jmcpyspqt30wscmntxy
Exciting, can't wait to listen.
I'm ready to stop hosting Coracle's user uploads. I know about nostr.band's API, does void.cat have one? Any other providers I should consider? I do intend to use relays for storage once that spec is finalized, but for now I need to stop hosting whatever.
π€ no obligation sir. If it helps, the topic is much closer to philosophy than politics, despite the title.
Yeah, although I would say religion always *informs* politics, rather than (primarily) being a tool *used* by politics. In other words, if religion is being "used", the users are actually either hypocrites, or adherents of a different religion.
That's because you adopt the frame they are criticizing. Reason has no race or gender.
Whoa, cool. Is this Android-only?
nostr:nprofile1qqszg7tnjk2w6kqz49ns8edgwz63tkvxnqj8ffclatscp68vl73s93spzemhxue69uhkxcfwwfjkcctev93xcefwdaexwqgkwaehxw309ash2tnjv4kxz7tpvfkx2tn0wfnszyrhwden5te0wpkx2c3wvdkx7atyxwl2sx if you're genuinely interested in an explanation of my comment yesterday, this will do better than I can. nostr:nprofile1qqsr7acdvhf6we9fch94qwhpy0nza36e3tgrtkpku25ppuu80f69kfqpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq3xamnwvaz7tmjv4kxz7tpvfkx2tn0wfns0qdmde this might be interesting to you too based on a conversation I remember from June.
Fantastic conversation on understanding identity politics in America. Covers race, gender, economics, and of course theology.
nostr:npub1jlrs53pkdfjnts29kveljul2sm0actt6n8dxrrzqcersttvcuv3qdjynqn I'd like to reuse your relay reviews approach on nostrapp.link for app reviews.
I see you're using [["L","social.coracle.ontology"],["l","review/relay","social.coracle.ontology","{\"quality\":1}"]
Should I create a separate ontology? Or just use review/app label? Any suggestions?
No, please borrow mine (or let me know what you end up using). Ontologies aren't meant to be app specific, just clear. I should probably have made that more clear in the nip.
Yes, and to an extent many will block illegal content. But that's distinct from allowing individuals to block whomever
Saw it on nos.lol. Looks like it got re-broadcasted
Mastodon is federated (many-centered), not decentralized. Relays can block stuff here too, but a relay blocking something does not block that thing for its users, unless they only use that relay.
Spam is (partly) solved by muting, because they want your attention, and you can simply deny them that using various tools for classifying content as undesirable. Harassment isn't solved by muting because they want other people's attention as well as yours.
But yes, Christian relays can (and should) block porn.