Avatar
techfeudalist
98a386c766ac9250f4ce1b500662fd08e4d464a1915743eedc83bd50521decac
Blessed by tech; working to bring the benefits to everyone. Freedom, incorruptible money, privacy.

Coinbase now limiting BTC withdrawals.

I don’t think it’s a coincidence that this and the FinCEN attacks are ramping up. This is the system’s response to the ETF being approved soon.

They want to trap you in the system they control.

https://nitter.cz/thecolinbrown/status/1716573084780802447#m

ICYMI: the vax injections were contaminated by foreign DNA. Some researchers are concerned those who took the shot may be genetically corrupted. I suspect that we’ll know in the next few months. Presumably someone will test a mother and baby and verify whether the mother has specific foreign genetic modifications and passed those to her child.

https://nitter.cz/robinmonotti/status/1715043769446224331#m

https://nitter.cz/phillyharper/status/1715078760997822749#m

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

I used to believe in political incrementalism- the idea that you can change things gradually through better election outcomes.

But maybe it was also just youth, I don’t know.

After spending many years studying how the current monetary system works, studying how past debt and currency cycles ended, and based on practical realities from the past two election cycles, I dropped any notion of incrementalism, at least for the big economic things.

Incrementalism works for minority groups to gain social and political rights. Religious people to practice without interference, women to vote, gay people to marry, etc. Immigration policies. Things like that. But it doesn’t work for the financial system.

Instead, history and current affairs suggest that things generally point in the same structural financial direction, uncontested, until there is a massive fiscal crisis, geopolitical crisis, and trend change. And that is when politics becomes critical in all aspects- as chaos develops, the group that has enough power to set the next order *really* fucking matters. They either build a platform of virtue toward the next cycle, or they fall into the unfortunately common paths of communism or fascism.

And it is not just ideas that triumph, but technology too. Technology plays a big role in which ideas are even workable. Both ideas and technology are important.

So when I realized incrementalism wasn’t working, I sought out other methods.

The weaker method is just social- I try to put things out there with my platform to encourage reason, empathy, human rights, etc. Not partisan but also not necessarily moderate, but rather grounded in firm principles of virtue ethics.

The stronger method is to play some small part in building something better. Alternative money. Alternative communication methods. Either explaining and recommending them to people, or directly venture investing in companies that build on them and help improve the UX and solve new problems.

That’s my goal. I want to do whatever tiny part I can to bring about more peace, more fairness, more opportunity, more growth, and less destruction.

Incrementalism also works for removing rights too. The elite boil us like frogs and eventually we find ourselves asking for permission and wondering where our rights went.

I wonder if we can classify when incrementalism works and when is doesn’t.

The ETF is a NgU lure, trapping people within the fiat banking and political system. Also the risk of paper bitcoin and rug pulls.

I know a few of these people. Hard to convince bankers not to trust banks.

“It’s not really bitcoin”, I say.

“I just want to buy it in my investment account like my Apple stock.”, they respond.

🤷‍♂️

Because, sadly, many people will buy the ETF thinking it’s bitcoin, giving up all of bitcoin’s benefits for convenience.

Alex, if you could do anything, how would you resolve this situation?

It’s a tough question. A few thoughts:

The effort to spend in repairing the relationship should be proportionate to the length of time you’ve known them.

If there was a change in their personality, consider that they may be suffering from the crises over the last few years.

Sometimes giving them some space can allow any hurt feelings to simmer down. You can always check in from time to time to let them know you’re around and thinking of them.

Yes, all animals look and act a certain way to attract mates. You see refined gender displays in birds, presumably because birds socialize in flocks, creating abundant choice. Individuals are forced to evolve specialized gender displays in an attempt to stand out.

Bower birds with their elaborate architectural constructions:

https://blog.nature.org/2021/01/04/bowerbirds-meet-the-bird-worlds-kleptomaniac-love-architects/

Birds of paradise courtship dance spectacle:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWfyw51DQfU

It’s the same with humans.

Listen to what this woman says:

https://www.tiktok.com/@lonerwithyou/video/7279190022698454278

She’s talking about traditional masculine gender display: “Chivalrous … wants to pay on the first date, wants to take care of you, to provide…”. She’s seeking security. She observes that men in her community of liberals don’t display these traits making it hard for her to find a suitable partner.

I agree that cultural shifts have occurred. Some of these shifts are minor (say, wearing dresses vs pants), while others are significant (men unable to provide security), like with the woman above. With the latter, you can see how economic changes are leading men to be less desirable in places like Japan which is leading to a decline in marriage.

https://www.nippon.com/en/features/c05604/

Anyway, my point is to not sabotage yourself. My hunch is that it’s not just your local area. You will, of course, expand the dating pool if you move to a larger city, but your matches there will be (how to say this nicely) … unstable. People who are stable and confident want to find partners who are also stable and confident. Do you want a stable and confident partner? Then consider what you’re communicating to the world.

Again, gender is not a self-centric concept. I worry that what you perceive as “subverting” is just undermining yourself. It’s like giving someone the gift of a phone with a smashed screen, or serving rotten food to your guests for dinner. It’s not about you, it’s about how others perceive you.

I understand the motivation. I think everyone has this part inside them that says “F..it, I’m not going to play this stupid game.” It’s unfair. Some people win the genetic lottery and others don’t. I think everyone, at some point, wants to take their ball and go home. Yeah, the system sucks but trying to “exit”, reduces your quality dating pool and increases your risk of being miserable for a long time. Humans can build a different reality for themselves. The better solution, IMHO, is to build yourself better. Proof of work.

Good luck! ✌️

Gender is the way that all animals, humans included, market ourselves to potential mates. Gender displays and behavior are really just nonverbal communication saying, “Choose me! I can provide safety, security, or help you raise a family."

Gender doesn’t seem to be an optional social construct. It’s role in sexual attraction is likely ancient and innate. Presumably our ancestors raised more successful children when they chose mates with certain physical and behavioral characteristics. Over the millennia those became deeply hardwired in us.

I came across this article a while back. 👇 The author recounts trying to two friends get dates. These two friends are popular gender nonconforming femmes - ie. feminine males. The author later realizes that few people are attracted to them:

“Nonbinary femmes like them are too masc for the straights, too femme for the gays, and too out for nearly everyone else.”

The article helped me understand that people can choose to be “gender non-conforming”, but that just reduces the pool of potential high quality partners.

Someone can be nonconforming, and change what they do and how they look, but they can’t change how others perceive them.

Your choice of life partner drastically affects your long term success and happiness. Whether you’re straight or gay, if your desired partner is attracted to a masculine person, it probably won’t be a successful strategy to present as feminine, and vice versa. It seems like the best strategy would be to work hard, become the best person you can be, and expand your options.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/wjq99z/why-cant-my-famous-gender-nonconforming-friends-get-laid