Avatar
James A Lewis
9a4acdeb978565e27490dca65c83e9f65745eaec1d9a0405a52d198c1489913b
Husband, father, #Catholic #Christian, Amateur Philosopher, Bitcoiner, freedom lover, word nerd #dadstr

Most definitely. It has to be known before it can be used, but it has to be developed before it can be known. That's the stage we're at now.

As well, I think we would need to distinguish between personal keys and legal entity keys, not technically but in practice. I as a legal entity would be making a listing, purchase, or whatever other action on the one npub, and I wouldn't want spicy memes to be on the same npub as my home purchase or whatever.

Now, it would be the same system, because sharing a listing from the market side to my personal npub would still be a good functionality.

I think the "administrator" of such a system would be local gov't. Key rotation would be ... key 👈😉 ... to ensure individual liberty, while some continuity from key to key would then be necessary for local law enforcement to ensure the laws of real estate (and other) sales are followed.

Right. I think some way of managing a legal entity npub, very different to a private and personal npub, would be the way most people would use this sort of an application. The point is that the information about listings is gatekept, but it doesn't have to be. Local parties (local gov't, investors, companies, and private owners) could broadcast information in a verifiable manner to a set of local relays for marketplace records, and those records being not only public but very available could expedite and make lower cost certain sales, especially real estate.

It doesn't just have to be Twitter replacements and media sharing, but real, high ticket commerce.

Whoa! I just realized that the real estate MLS can be replaced by nostr! Not only that, but nostr could make the sale public knowledge immediately and expedite the discovery process needed to be sure the seller is the authentic owner. Inspections could be made public as well, and those inspectors' credentials could also be public and verifiable...

One system!

This could be the killer app!

Undressing for strangers is super cringe. How did we as a culture get tricked into thinking it's okay?

Prostitution, even digital or as a tease, is shameful and illegitimate work. It's neither good for the producer nor consumer of the "service". I hope our culture eventually realizes it yet again.

Honestly... I actually appreciate not seeing nudity anymore while I scroll and zap on Amethyst. I don't know what I'm missing, but I don't feel I am missing much if anything.

Replying to Avatar walker

nostr:npub1hu3hdctm5nkzd8gslnyedfr5ddz3z547jqcl5j88g4fame2jd08qh6h8nh and I had a blast coming on #CoinStories — thanks for having us, nostr:npub1ahxjq4v0zlvexf7cg8j9stumqp3nrtzqzzqxa7szpmcdgqrcumdq0h5ech ! And thank you for all you do for the #Bitcoin space 🙏

https://youtu.be/5_Qf8Oyuvww

Hey! Very cool. Listening now 🤙

Is it possible to simply tag posts with NSFW and have organic social enforcement? Such as users flag npubs that post untagged NSFW posts, and users can subscribe to those flags and auto-mute those flagged npubs? I think this is how some anti-spam works too.

A new CSS media query:

'''

@media (prefers-color-scheme: seasonal) {

/* nice styles */

}

'''

For sure. Sodomy is an unclean act, not a relationship, that is always wrong and matters not with whom. Sodomy is not sex. I hate it when people call it "gay sex," because it is a fundamental misuse of the sexual faculties.

Undue legislation just burdens those who obey and does not help them live better lives. I feel the same about the tax code here. No one knows the whole code (especially because it keeps changing), and only the very rich ($10M+ net worth) can really afford to game it. I say the state ought not have more claim to one's income than the portion God formulated (10% tithe).

Now, back to sex 🤣 sometimes keeping it simple is the best policy. No need to complicate it with new rules if no new behavior needs ethical evaluation.

I think the problem is that the basic rule of respecting the teleological purpose of sex is muddied by people's desires, well- and ill-formed. People aren't thinking "is this inline with the way we are made and meant to act?" They think "I want this," and more complex but clearer rules need formulating.

> the wealthy tax cheat pay

They played by the rules. The rules are "pay the rule maker and don't pay more taxes. The issue isn't clever wealthy people but an overly complex system only the wealthy can afford to game.

Also, anything above a 10% income tax is ridiculous. What's our ROI? Wars. Bad deal. Let's go back to war bonds that require the cooperation and consent of the citizenry.