You got me but it’s way past my bedtime. Guess I’ll have to wait until the morning to find out what happens at 0.
1st sail in his own boat!
#sailing 
My favorite will always be how they load women's hair with hairspray to make it look like it's floating around, but it ends up hard as a rock and moves with their head 🤣🤣 (example: 00:25)
Pure comedy. #NASA
https://video.nostr.build/e4f27719e403247097625d35b02866b2fade9cbdd11eab089f184f25cc6af095.mp4
Isn’t it nice that the USA, Russia and China can all work together when it comes to conning the world that we’ve been to space and have a space station.
I can’t stand the smell of coffee.
Not particularly a fan of tea either.
It takes more effort than you might think turning down hot drinks.
What’s with ‘husr’ and ‘hue’? Saw this somewhere else and dismissed it as a typo
They wouldn’t even notice, it permanently cloudy anyway 😂
Great, thanks. I enjoyed this interaction. You made some excellent, well reasoned points.
Who said anything about lying?
My point was that there is no financial incentive IMO.
I just can’t see any logic in the theory.
What do they say? Follow the money.
1) spend a lot on developing, testing and deploying this contrail technology. This would have to include their own fleet of planes or paying off airline companies + presumably some amount of lobbying to get regulators and government to look the other way. That’s a significant outlay.
2) continue to deploy for an unknown amount of time until farmers yields become so low they decide to sell their farms.
Falling yields would presumably lead to food shortages and rising food prices.
We’re already seeing populations declining because of the cost of living so it stands to reason that food shortages and increased prices would exacerbate this.
How long have contrails been talked about, 5 years? Food prices have gone up during that time but not because of falling yields. So that’s 5 years of expenses on this either 0 return and no proof of concept.
Farmers would probably need 3 bad years in a row to call it quits so even if it starts working now that’s still another 3 years of expenses.
3) buy farms at cheap prices and start to farm them directly.
So let’s be generous and say it’s a decade from 1st dollar spent to 1st farm purchased.
Then what? Buy all the farms, control the food supply, jack up prices so you can turn a profit running the farms and make a return on the decade + of investment.
But people are already struggling because of increased prices. Increasing food prices more is going to contribute to populations continuing to fall. Lower population = less food sold = less money for the evil corporations.
I’m not trying to pick a fight. I am asking for anyone to lay out a logical reason as to why companies would want to do this because I can’t see what the financial incentive is and ‘power’ is not typically what incentivises companies to make massive investments of extremely long periods of time.
I’m not arguing if the vaccines were safe or not, simply on the science of how they work so Biologists please correct me if I’m wrong.
RNA doesn’t change your DNA its function is to tell the cell organelles what to do.
The m stands for messenger.
In the mRNA ‘vaccines’ the mRNA gives all cell organelles the same set if instructions.
This bypasses the need to have the immune system meet the virus and create its own anti bodies (which is how a ‘traditional’ vaccine or actually catching the ‘disease’ works). With mRNA you jump straight to the ‘vaccine’ telling your body “make this”.
What I am trying to say is that the mechanism by which an immune response is created is fundamentally different in an mRNA vaccine compared to a traditional style vaccine and so it’s factually inaccurate to say that everyone who received a vaccine was injected with mRNA unless the vaccine companies who produced ‘traditional’ vaccines lied about what was in them and no-one bothered to check.
And that’s the group approved conspiracy theory is it?
I suppose if you squint hard enough and forget about the fact that Bayer and Monsanto are public traded companies which fiduciary duties to their share holders you could maybe see that almost making sense.
But Monsanto Bayer already make a killing just selling stuff to farmers who then take all the risk of crop failures etc and work very hard to make almost no profit. Why would Monsanto and Bayer want to take on that extra risk and extra work for absolutely minimal profits? There is no financial incentive there for them.
And Bill Gates is involved why?
Please elaborate.
What are they trying to achieve?
How do they benefit?
Seems like a collusion of that magnitude would be hard to keep under wraps.
Not all vaccines were mRNA vaccines therefore not all of the 5m mentioned received an mRNA shot
Truly crisp, blue skies are nearly extinct 💨✈️
Jarring and depressing as hell to think about, but the future is looking dark (literally) if we don't put a stop to the #geoengineering insanity and fast.
https://video.nostr.build/e0d20ce0e446b1c9195a1a695f0da560183571b021d8768e580fea38aba3682d.mp4
What’s the purpose?
Who benefits?
Creating extra cloud over the UK seems utterly pointless as it’s cloudy most of the time anyway.
Going to take my boy sailing in his 1st Optimist.
What did Spain do to be targeted during christmas, in wonder?
https://www.newarab.com/news/hundreds-spanish-judges-demand-madrid-cut-ties-israel
Oh. Obviously.
In what way is Spain being targeted. Would you have me believe that the people perpetrating this ‘conspiracy’ understand how to make clouds but not how pressure systems affect those clouds? The ‘contrails’ shown in the picture never make landfall over Spain, they move north towards the British isles
If only all beef production looked like this.
