Crackers! Crackers! Antagonistas, sejam antagônicos à imprecisão na linguagem que assola a classe jornalística. Crackers presos! Crackers!
Not to mention the fact of Israel routinely doing worse to the other side for decades.
Why do you think you should, out of curiosity?
It slouches toward Bethlehem.
Being among those old enough to be able to answer one way or the other, I can tell you not all—which isn’t to say none or even few—of us regret, or are displeased with the consequences of, decisions one might put in those terms. The cautionary note is relevant, the implied advice is beneficial, but there are also some who need to hear they are not defective or lesser for not being as blithe and gregarious as the others around them.
Sometimes it is. Every basket has its share of bad apples, when it comes to apple baskets; but not every basket is an apple basket—and some apple baskets carry more bad apples than good ones.
I don’t think they are solving the same problem, no, though they may say so, even believe so; once we move beyond appearances, see how their trees inevitably grow, the fruits they inevitably bear, mere variations in perspective simply cannot account for half of it; still, and so much for well worded, “goal” would have been a better choice to convey my meaning, though you might not consider it much of an improvement. My point remains, however; I don’t think you’re saying what they seem to think you’re saying—and vice-versa. As to duck typing, it may work in programming (the debate rages on), but it is lacking when it comes to honest dialogue or logic—and, ironically enough, “moves like a duck, quacks like a duck,” pretty much describes Che Guevara’s approach to sending people to the paredón.
Nevertheless, there is more Unix-nature in one line of shell script than there is in ten thousand lines of C. It seems at least two distinct conversations are happening here, despite the parties treating them as one. Would you describe a need to literally fight another man for food as indicative of civilization? I think not. Your interlocutors, are they proposing socialism as an alternative? Not here, they aren’t. Throwing punches has its place, but I advance the possibility that you gentlemen will come to realize you are in fact approaching the same problem from different angles, rather than from different armies.
E eu prestes a parabenizá-lo pelo matrimônio.
“Nature never accepts a cash payment in full for anything — this would be an injustice to the poor and to the weak. ... It is only the progressive installment plan Nature recognizes. No man can make a habit in a moment or break it in a moment. It is a matter of development, of growth. But at any moment man may *begin* to make or begin to break any habit. This view of the growth of character should be a mighty stimulus to the man who sincerely desires and determines to live nearer to the limit of his possibilities.” — William George Jordan, [The Kingship of Self-Control](https://www.artofmanliness.com/character/manly-lessons/manvotional-the-kingship-of-self-control/), in *Self-Control, Its Kingship and Majesty*, 1905.
> For most consumer apps, however, it"s rarely a good idea.
For whom?
De certa forma, eu segui o caminho inverso, começando pela solidão e pelos livros, então acabei lendo bastante. De todos que li, esse foi um dos livros mais úteis — e sendo leitura interessante, envolvente, lê-lo é unir o útil ao agradável. Boa leitura!
hey -- we want to send you a test zap, but couldn’t find a NIP-05 or ⚡ lightning address on your profile. u can set one up for free on rizful https://rizful.com ... then pls reply here and we will do a test zap.
Go ahead.
Aging will be defeated within 20 years. Immunologist Derya Unutmaz stated that the rejuvenation method is already ready, and all that remains is to wait for suitable technologies, which will emerge in the next 5 to 10 years.
"Please don't die in the next 10 years."
https://blossom.primal.net/b3a5465e353f4e75402edac588efc9db7b43a525fb0c7abbf4fdad04f0d301f5.mp4
History goes round and round; growing old is a tally of the telly announcing some old thing as new. Whatever became of Timothy Leary, by the way? He played the scientist last time they rebooted this one.
I totally stole the idea of reading 33 pages a day, as mention by nostr:npub1zw7ftkfpezmtym8n2j2fvnd0smunztl9pyjys0fxdqne08vq397s5yvpu5 recently. Something about that number just works and has got me back into a better reading discipline / habit.
X < 33. Write X page(s) for each 33 pages read. Or X line(s) of code. Some X of whatever it is your creativity brings forth.
Al Capone que o diga.
Proscribe the very concept of objectivity as tyranny; give finagling a cute nickname like #jeitinhobrasileiro and, when not praising it, laugh it over; in fact, laugh everything over — _castigat ridendo mores,_ huehuehue! — and mock those who are serious about anything — specially if they are serious about learning, those eggheads — and if this is not enough, even coupled with the nearly-universal adoption of a parenting strategy consisting of letting screens raise candy-brained, Ritalin junkies, then structure your bureaucracy around humiliating, even punishing, those who strive to walk the straight path while being lenient, if not rewarding, toward those who don’t. If a country does all this, and worse, and more for long enough, can the result be any different?
One day at a time.
Possível, senão provável, passo seguinte seria a criminalização de VPNs ou tecnologias semelhantes, todavia; é o que tem sido discutido, temido, pela comunidade internacional de privacidade — o que ora ocorre vendo no Brasil não sendo fenômeno nacional ou isolado. Sempre há e haverá formas de evadir a vigilância, mas atravessar uma ponte é mais eletrizante quando um deslize pode resultar em afogamentos.