RFK is a good candidate. IMO one of the best we’ve seen in a long time. But I still can’t figure out why he is (or was) so opposed to nuclear, and shut down a nuclear plant in NY that forced them to use more fossil fuels. Everything i can find about his position seems to relate to the economics of nuclear.

Have his stances changed? Was it simply a misunderstanding of nuclear 5 years ago? Or was the technology for nuclear different 5 years ago?

Haven't tested my multisig cold storage since I set it up.

Should I do a sanity check every 6 months or so to just prove to myself I can still move coins?

Man this nicotine patch is just not quite cutting it.

cardamom is the best spice for baking, if you don’t have it, wyd?

i’d buy the dip if i wasn’t so POOR.

Which one is your favourite Tesla model:

S

3

X

Y

You know what I like doing?

I like releasing a brand new product that no one has seen before at a $3500 price point and then turning around and try and squash someone's labor of love, publicly.

Some CEOs just need to be tarred and feathered.

You know, I'm listening to that new Saylor podcast and it's funny.. they mention two things separately but don't seem to rub these two thoughts together.

1. Saylor says you can't roll into someone else's country and start killing people because their Bitcoin is in their head and there would be nothing to seize.

2. The most virtuous thing you can do is die with your keys because your loss is everyone else's gain.

..... Isn't there technically some form of incentive structure there for bitcoiners to murder each other, given every all lost bitcoin increases the value of the rest?

Like, if 50% of all bitcoiners lived on an island, don't the other 50% stand to gain from a sudden major loss of life there?

Grim thought.

What is your minimum threshold in SATs to be notified by zap spammers?