Some crackhead violently enters your house and rapes your wife. Do you kill the crackhead's mother in revenge, or do you just let the crackhead get away with it?
Ya, 'cause you spam shit. Don't get me wrong, I still follow you, but that doesn't mean you don't post spam sometimes.
nostr:nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpqtv4hzhffegttgzw6qkzjp7h2qfnys0qyu04z8q38thstwz858vzsdjlgsd >am a pedo, and an artist.
>Some of the things you might see in my art: kids, animals, feet, armpits, pee, scat, bdsm, gore, snuff.
>If you would like to support me and my art please let me know so we can discuss payment options!
How about we repay you for your artistic efforts by using rusty needles to tear off your fingernails?
Damn, you're really willing to give that as payment for those kinds of artistic efforts? I'll tell you what, extend that offer to me and I'll do a commission for you. Sound like a plan?
Er, thank you for responding, but your messages have some serious problems. You already said that "you have no rights," but now you've turned around and said "you have one right." (To kill all agents of the state apparently.)
You also committed to the idea that anything which can be taken away can't be a right, but I'm pretty sure that the ability to kill agents of the state can be taken away in a number of ways pretty easily.
And finally, you responded to my questions about rights by telling me that "the only thing that cannot be taken away is dignity." But unfortunately your response doesn't really provide me any insight into your notion of rights, since you don't actually tell me whether you consider dignity to be a right or not. Additionally, I'm just as lost as to how you expect me to interpret "dignity" as I am with how you interpret the word "right". It doesn't help that dignity seems like it can be taken away just as easily as with all your other examples.
I guess I have to ask you, what exactly are you trying to do in this concersation? Are you just saying things to test me and try to see what I'll disagree with? Are you jusy trying to be edgy in order to look cool or something? Are you just trying to explain your beliefs about rights? I'm really not sure how to respond to you at this point.
I see. One time I tried to use Discord over Tor and the voice chat did not work at all. I had no idea why until like a year later when I learned about the difference between TCP and UDP and how UDP doesn't work over Tor. I've tried Tor before VPN and I can confirm that it works. (Though it's a huge pain in the ass to set up.) It doesn't make sense to do in many contexts, but for my plans it does. Actually Tor before an SSH tunnel is probably better than a VPN for me. Very low overhead.
Beautiful, just beautiful. Just look at the contrast between the "No girl should have to go through what I did, all men are animals" and the fact that he engages with this fantasy on purpose and clearly gets off to it.
The world needs more posts like this.
I don't know what that means. So none of the UDP goes over Tor?
Of course they did. Tor is the evil hacker protocol. Shame on you for using Tor instead of purchasing hours on grandma's hacked PC. Darknet botnets are much more ethical then volunteer Tor nodes. That's why they are less likely to be blocked.
Apparently torrents can operate over TCP. Maybe that's what you are doing.
So VPN'ing my entire lan was a bad idea because it broke DNS in some applications
Back to Tor i guess
Do you have any issues with UDP traffic when using Tor?
Pretty sure that has zero affect. Also, I can verify that Zapstore has not been flagged.
By the way, sorry for not noticing earlier. Congratulations on all of your "hateful speech" flags. I'm proud of you.
nostr:nprofile1qqsyvrp9u6p0mfur9dfdru3d853tx9mdjuhkphxuxgfwmryja7zsvhqpzamhxue69uhhv6t5daezumn0wd68yvfwvdhk6tcpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcscpyug why am I getting a Content Warning on this note on amethyst, any idea?
You probably just accidentally hit the "sensitive" button while writing your post.
Maybe we should ban being a sex offender first.
I see you still haven't responded to the post I lovingly crafted just for you. nostr:nevent1qqsgfqddz8xpe0zh9cdkajlvs8mfdfeur76le3dkwhwzfmmn59he47qpzemhxue69uhkummnw3ex2mrfw3jhxtn0wfnj7q3q4pa5q2kqs8ygfxuat02w88ezsle9wzwnu0meu7z2785t8rl0hhcsxpqqqqqqz7e260j You're going to make me sad. I was interested to see how you'd respond.
It seems to me that you believe that if somrthing can be taken away, then it isn't a right. Am I understanding your position correctly? If so, I would like to know: can you name anything different that you believe can prevent something from being a right? Can you name a situation where something cannot be taken away, but it still isn't a right?
Intelligence is not magic, it's sleight of hand. There are infinite little tricks that we can add to our bag throughout our life, but ultimately anything "smart" that we gain the ability to do will only ever be due to a finite number of these tricks.
In other words, intelligence is just knowledge or wisdom that the speaker can't articulate. Solving a Rubix Cube is only smart until someone tells you the tricks. Being able to do differential calculus is only smart until you learn the chain rule and the derivatives of your atomic functions. And an IQ test is just any test where the creator can't articulate the tools needed to actually come up with the solutions.
I will never call myself "smart", because that should never be necessary if I ac actually articulate my tricks.
The people's rights. The people's property rights are violated by the government in order to fund the "signposts" you are putting your propoganda on.
But I suppose you aren't directly violating their rights yourself, so my statements about what I want were inaccurate. I was probably mixed up because of the fact that this proposed strategt is just as flawed as if you were to directly violate people's property rights yourself.
What I should have said is that I want to rely on preventing rights violations in order to defeat the government instead of solely relying on all the rights violations that we didn't prevent. If it's just communication, then it should be done some other way. Like a poster and tape.
Your arguments are probably too complex and probably have too many irrelevant details.

