Trying that tantrum on is likely instinct.
Learning it works if you escalate far enough is 100% learned. Maybe purely operant conditioning in babies, but there is also intentionality and cognition at work in toddlers' tantrums.
My boys were never indulged for tantrums, so they stopped at 2. Friends' kids I've babysat ARE indulged for tantrums so they continue. Until the second time I babysit them, then they just grumpy but respectful until mummy and daddy are back.
Tantrums are the parents/caregivers fault.
Always.
But its usually fixable up until about the age the kids start to vote.
You expect AI governance to be implemented with a planning horizon further out than next press conference?
That would be a very, very different world to the one we live in.
Instead, I'm anticipating "Idiocracy" with robot babysitters, but set in a slum.
I remember being so relieved when my parents finally separated.
People think they can hide a high-conflict relationship from their kids.
They're delusional. Divorce is bad - but high-conflict is worse. Not every difference can be bridged, and not every partner is even worth it.
Create an Insta throw-away and then report all their asses for Hate!
:p
I saw some npub claiming to be Linus Torvalds the other day.
My proposal won't fix that.
NIP-05 is supposed to, but its easily gamed since the DNS system has perverse incentives.
Not a silver bullet, its true.
An honest person with a common handle WILL be flagged for attention. That's okay.
Not worried about cases where the scammer is here first - scammers want to steal credibility from existing accounts, this breaks their business model if they have to build followings the hard way
IMHO, clients need to include a warning - red background or something - on posts by npubs with the same name as an npub you have previously interacted with.
This won't prevent people from using a common first name as their handle, but it will disincentivise it, and also highlight possible scammers.
In theory, yes it should.
In practise, if the Chacho is more responsibly managed / less printed than the Peso, that 1:1 peg will make the Chacho harder to find, and its purchasing power will rise slightly over the Peso. The reverse if it is less well managed.
But mostly it should track the Peso.
My concern is more if the Chacho were to be abruptly withdrawn, in case of a Federal ban or the local government ceasing to accept it as payment of taxes and charges.
Amethyst has a "connect via tor/orbot" in the main "swipe right" menu.
Other Nostr clients can still be made to use Tor by going into the Orbot app, clicking "apps" and selecting your Nostr client. Reboot your phone, and when you go back into your Nostr client it will be using Tor
Nostr is the right place for ppl like us :)
Still looking for answers to that myself.
If you find some good tactics, share plz!
"Avoid head-on battles you won't win" has a good track record for me.
"Malicious compliance" was my favourite in the Army. Most rules are stupid, and the most complex, top-down rule systems simply beg to be used against their bosses.
Many!
If you click the three-stacked-dots in the top-right corner of a post, you can block or report the poster.
And if you swipe-right and then click on "security", you can block posters, keywords and tags you don't want to see.
For users, #tor fixes this - servers and relays can't be force to reveal your real IP and identity if they never had it.
For operators, #tor also fixes this - they can't kick in your door and steal all your stuff if they can't even tell which continent your server is really in.
https://torproject.org for users, https://whonix.org for operators.
In individuals?
Probably not.
In a society?
We're going to build that, starting with Nostr!
Interested, but would never have the time as a proper adult :(
Microdosed on smoked DMT once when young, was weird rather than insight-provoking, and quickly over.
She lives in a village in a forest, and knows almost enough about history :)
Hate to say it, but this is actually a pretty good take.
That last line is powerful and needs to be more widely repeated.
Putting the controversial aspects to one side, Participatory Budgeting is a thing and should be supported as a transitional arrangement at least.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Participatory_budgeting
Direct Democracy > Elective Oligarchy > Unelected Careerist Bureaucracy
Its called "civilisation". Domestication, of human beings.
It works. Until it doesn't.
Sadly I agree.
Proof of Violence > Proof of Work.
Except in "black" and international markets.
Git is, and anyone can run a server; but most ppl use GitHub on top of it, and GitHub is a cathedral.
I'm with Machiavelli - a wise Prince should destroy ALL the castles in his realm unless he already fears The People more than invaders.
Any organisation large enough to demand public oversight to protect investors from their hired managers is a castle in need of demolition.
I like this metaphor.
It also makes it clear why the system is so unpopular, with those at the top seeking a modern-day Licence to Crenellate and royal help suppressing peasant uprisings

