God, I fucking love open source lol forever goat
Ahhh nice thatās pretty sick
You guys look like modern day founding fathers in this
You guys this is actually so coolā¦
I have not read anything more than the post but if Iām intuiting right this is likeā¦ you creating a local wallet hub that you keep running persistently but can still execute remote tx to/from (with vm ext) making you like a wandering node when youāre nomading about?
Because essentially youāve created a liquidity mint from your home that has been verified through your key gen?
lol thatās so coolā¦ is this whatās happening nostr:npub1gzuushllat7pet0ccv9yuhygvc8ldeyhrgxuwg744dn5khnpk3gs3ea5ds
Ok, here we go! A little demo on how you can use the Nutoff wallet. This is not meant to have a good UX, as it's just for educational and experimental purposes. But if you want to play with it, follow these steps:
1. Open your terminal, and navigate to a directory where you feel comfortable placing the codebase of this project. Then, run `git clone https://github.com/gzuuus/nutoff-wallet.git`
2. Navigate into the `nutoff-wallet` directory and run `bun i`
(I assume you can use other package managers, but it will definitely work with https://bun.sh )
3. Now, just run the wallet by executing `bun run mcp-server.ts`
It has some default settings, but it is highly recommended to set a private key. This way, every time you execute the wallet, it will have the same public key. Also, configure some allowed public keys; these will be able to spend from the wallet. Just put your public key. It also accepts a list of keys if you want more than one key to be able to spend from the wallet. See the `example.env` file for more details.
At this point, your wallet is running, and you should see a message like this one
The last line shows the public key of your wallet. Now you can either go to https://contextvm.org/s/
That's it! Now, to see the balance or pay invoices from there, you can either use your wallet remotely by going to https://contextvm.org/s/
Remember that the wallet has to be on to be able to receive payments, so ideally, you'll run this on a device that is always on, or that is on for some hours each day. While it is on, it can be used remotely.
This is just a proof of concept. Much better UI/UX can be done, and an interface can also be built as a static site, or even a hypernote. š Imagination is the limit!
So cool
Huh thatās interesting I didnāt know that but thatās pretty cool
Mangos were one of my main food groups! Ha
I feel like knots has to the be the CIA side because they keep saying theyāre gonna call the FBI but then again that could be an m night shamylan twist
Yes Iām going back to the grocery store to get whipped cream tomorrow. I was like, āI wonder if Lukeās mom put whipped cream on hers?ā
The Assassination of Charlie Kirk
nostr:nprofile1qqsp4lsvwn3aw7zwh2f6tcl6249xa6cpj2x3yuu6azaysvncdqywxmgpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejszrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqn6fyyw X nostr:nprofile1qqstm84k2lp9knmvmf5gw88zvfvar7duvfpqfplryfystdn55ug2gkspz4mhxue69uhkummnw3ex2mrfw3jhxtn0wfnszyrhwden5te0dehhxarj9ekxzmny64nsmq X nostr:nprofile1qqstnem9g6aqv3tw6vqaneftcj06frns56lj9q470gdww228vysz8hqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejszrthwden5te0dehhxtnvdakqh2km6a X nostr:nprofile1qqsvfr3f7p95stxqrjslnmuvsmhcxxxqt8swjdfjx5tz7zq0yms5cygpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejs8gtcg6
Fountain: https://www.fountain.fm/episode/6vtEdgehdhsP7KJtlBND
YouTube: https://youtu.be/QHs2jEqCT2Q
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/episode/10jbxP5IF5dOwVv6HIxwkn
GET EMAILED: https://walkeramerica.substack.com/
SHOW NOTES: https://open.substack.com/pub/walkeramerica/p/the-assassination-of-charlie-kirk
Everywhere else: https://bitcoinpodcast.net/podcast
Me, listening to this while Iām doing the dishesā¦
*absolutely no one*
nostr:nprofile1qqstm84k2lp9knmvmf5gw88zvfvar7duvfpqfplryfystdn55ug2gkspz4mhxue69uhhwmm59eek7anzd96zu6r0wd6qz9thwden5te0v4jx2m3wdehhxarj9ekxzmny2ajcc9 : āYOU THE DUDE WASHING YOUR DISHESā
š immediately in my head *bro Iām a chick*
One thing about having been around for a very long time I have friends in my algo from all categories of various fork wars and itās hilarious to watch this all like a kaleidoscope
Like some dude I know who was raging all of 2017 pops in with a banger of a technical explanation and then subtweets like a futuristic Leonardo DiCaprio meme āsee!!!!! I told you guys segwit is fucked!!!ā šššš
There is no excuse in 2025 for not reviewing the code.
Holy shitā¦ I think my old timeline has intersected with where we all are
One of my best guy friends messaged me and said āwhere the fuck have you been?ā
ššš and I was like ābro I rlly donāt knowā¦ā
Solo shadow mining might be able to stop itā¦ the more distributed the better, protection nets for shadow miners
Showed my mom who is a massive privacy freak (and has been getting orange pilled by me for a decade) the nostr:nprofile1qqs9pk20ctv9srrg9vr354p03v0rrgsqkpggh2u45va77zz4mu5p6ccpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qg7waehxw309ahx7um5wgkhqatz9emk2mrvdaexgetj9ehx2ap0p44t0y āwar on bitcoin privacyā YouTube and now my mom is big Calle fan lol
She was like āthis is what I believeā šš
Best possible universe, indeed.
Elara Voss is retired.
AHEMā¦.!!!
DISCOURAGEMENT_THRESHOLD
Cypherpunk ethos.
*Feel free to ignore, I just want to sign for this with redundant sets of keys for the future*
Based on her recent posts, @AstrayaNthemoon (who goes by "gel") appears to hold a staunchly pro-consensus, privacy-centric view of Bitcoin that aligns with the "small blocker" philosophy from the 2017 scaling debates. At its core, her stance criticizes "big blockers"āthose who advocated for increasing Bitcoin's block size to handle more transactions on-chaināfor prioritizing their vision over established network consensus, which she sees as a fundamental betrayal of Bitcoin's decentralized ethos. In her words, the issue wasn't the theoretical merits of dynamic block sizes but rather that big blockers "chose to reject majority consensus and fragment the network" once it became clear through software adoption (primarily Bitcoin Core with SegWit) that the majority favored a different path. This led to the Bitcoin Cash fork, where she emphasizes that merchants played a pivotal role by refusing to honor the new chain's hash trail, declaring they would not accept "that coin." For her, this underscores a key principle: Bitcoin's integrity relies on alignment between miners (who produce blocks) and merchants (who validate and accept the coin), as "someone mines the coin and someone accepts the coin, and those people control the network."
This position isn't isolated; it ties into her broader cypherpunk ideology, where Bitcoin is inherently "censorship resistant" and designed as "black market money" rather than a sanitized, regulated asset. She argues that attempts to impose filters or "standardness" rulesāsuch as mempool policies that reject non-standard transactionsācreate a false sense of security and fragment users' observation of the chain, ultimately undermining its resilience. "Filters donāt work," she asserts, warning that they give "the illusion of a safe chain" while enabling potential collusion among miners and merchants to censor transactions, blurring the line between privacy and consensus. In her view, privacy isn't a bolt-on feature but "the entire point" of Bitcoin, and any mechanism that separates it from core consensus risks disturbing the network's foundational censorship resistance.
She praises figures like @callebtc for embodying "true cypherpunk" values, such as refusing to run certain nodes (like libbitcoin) not out of disrespect but to preserve unfiltered, raw network interaction.
This extends to her support for diverse node implementations, categorizing the Bitcoin ecosystem into "5 teams"āCore, Knots, libbitcoin, "not gonna node" (perhaps a nod to non-participants or minimalists), and China (likely referring to concentrated mining power)āto highlight the need for distributed, non-collusive control.
Her critique of big blockers also reflects on how the 2017 debate unfolded amid evolving digital landscapes. She notes that censorship was more pervasive back then, with "walled gardens" and algorithmic shadow bans limiting discourse, whereas today, tools like Nostr enable more robust, decentralized discovery of ideas. This has made current discussions feel "different in layers," less susceptible to botnets or artificial amplification that plagued the scaling wars.
She credits @jack (Jack Dorsey) for advancing this shift, quoting him on privacy's centrality and even referencing his skepticism toward Lightning Network as potentially improvable, suggesting she's open to alternatives that better align with on-chain privacy without compromising consensus.
Ultimately, her stance champions Bitcoin as a resilient, privacy-first system where consensus emerges organically from software adoption and economic incentives, not forced forks or top-down impositions. She warns against illusions of controlāwhether through filters, centralized discourse, or rejected forksāand advocates for a network where nodes are "as far apart as possible" to maximize decentralization.
This positions her as a defender of Bitcoin's original cypherpunk roots, critical of any deviation that fragments the chain or dilutes its resistance to external pressures.
Oh for sureā¦ but Iām queen lurk and observe so it makes sense honestly
Ooooh this is good š
Now that Iām on my best behavior I really donāt have a lot to say Iāve noticed š
My husbands probably like āthank godā