Now you're going back to "absolute" scarcity, which is not what I said. I said Monero it more scarce RIGHT NOW and for the next two decades.
Yes or no? It's simple math.
Yes, sooner, but that wasn't my argument, stick to the topic.
What good is discovering a bug when there is now fake Bitcoin that was exchanged for real goods and services?
1) Rollback: You throw all those merchants/users under the bus who just gave away real products and services for free. Catastrophic for user confidence.
2) Keep the inflated Bitcoin: 21 milion Bitcoin is no longer a meme. Catastrophic for user confidence.
Meanwhile you can't say one negative criticism about Bitcoin and one good thing about Monero because of your bags. You're pure emotion.
It is right now and for the next two decades lmao. You can't do simple math? 18mil vs 19mil?
You're cute when you're mad 😊
100% of Bitcoin transactions are FOREVER written on the blockchain and FOREVER public.
You know Lightning is built on Bitcoin and you know you can be forced closed onto it right? Somebody also has to onramp and offramp at some point from and to it🤪
That applies to all crypto becoming breakable eventually including your private keys lmfao. But you don't worry about that , why? Because you will be long dead by the time that ever happens.
And Monero privacy going forward will always continue improving so seethe about it.
Ok, sorry I was wrong, 0.001% of LN transactions *might* be okay and will fail at routing 99% of the time. Success! 🥳✅
#SuperPivateLN
"Moving the goalposts aging, retard? Keep attacking #Bitcoin while you hold it."
Take your own advice
But no, I said right now it is scarcer, but I've never said Monero is "absolutely scarce" vs Bitcoin 😂
Show me
"...privacy feature because you don't know how to correctly use #LN "
You already forget what you said? Don't overload your two braincells
"iF he caN't trAce thaT meAN NO OnE CaN traCE"
Flawless logic, smoothy 😂
You are the naive users they speak of
lmao
note16u84t56a3e9ay42msc57h9f0x26hh44rtkfj0rtsra447amcn4lsfrhwk5
Discovering a bug is useless after it has been exploited, smoothy
tbh sync times are pretty tiny inconvenience for me. I use it often enough. And I only ever have to wait like 5-10 seconds at most
I would say Cake Wallet and Stack Wallet sync pretty fast. It's less of a problem if you use it relatively often or open it every once in awhile.
But Cake Wallet now has an auto-sync feature that does it in the background once a day or so, so you are never far behind when you decide to open it.
"Are LN users naively thinking LN is private?"
"If you searCh: mONErO BUg"
How out of date are those searches I wonder? And let me guess about any recent ones. It was an increase in probability. On only one layer of Monero's privacy. In a specific scenario.
How about this search:
https://bitcoincore.org/en/2018/09/20/notice/
Throws into question all the claims of transparent auditability like it's some impenetrable force field. Where all of bitcoins fate rested on one lone anon secretly divulging an inflation bug to devs who couldve also chosen to covertly exploit it. And you would be none the wiser until it was too late! There is no solution for an inflated exploit bug without hurting users who now hold "fake" Bitcoin they recieved for real products and services. And the shaken credability to Bitcoin would also be catastrophic.
Bitcoin relies on luck more than you or any maxi would like to admit.
You audit Monero the same way you audit Bitcoin. You run a node.
While technically true to some extent...No Bitcoiner is taking advantage of it's transparent/simple math to scrutinize the blockchain anyway. Is anyone making sure every ten minutes that all inputs = all outputs? No. We just run nodes and pay no mind. So in practice there isn't any difference.
Not without some major trade offs including altering Bitcoins mining incentives. Can't have your cake and eat it too.
There is a small scenario/gap in there where Monero centralizes first, but Bitcoin wouldn't be far behind. Also, this assumes everyone is using Bitcoin mostly in a transparent way AKA as a panopticon chain. Which wouldn't be ideal...