Avatar
inventor
b2f81d1ffccad96017a8ce0307e2f777a476aed4daf22894b1355c2c98eea120
Fuck Israhell

You are literally worse than Hitler (who is worse than Satan, who is better than God) and you are literally trying to end their lives, you do want to exterminate them, just because they identify as Special Cupcakes, and they know this because of your far right dog whistles.

Your anti-science disinformation is proof of that, and you deserve to be punched in the face and be sent to reeducation as the extreme white supremacist that you are.

I wish a fat black lady reeducates you to death.

Idiocracy. That's the reason. We live in real life Idiocracy.

There can only be one Creator. How can you own property as if you were God?

What if other "created-in-the-image-of-God-being" decides that what is "yours" (according to you), is his?

There is a profound error in this kind of thinking. This is the kind of thought that creates wars among humans.

Did you take Vitamin D already? High doses? As everyone here recommended you to do?

Property is not a right. It formally is for the time being because of our current stage of development.

We are all stewards, not owners.

If you care about something, you want the best for that "something", and you keep it safe and close to you. That doesn't mean that it "belongs" to you exclusively.

Not even your physical body is yours.

Violations of supposed "property rights" are actually violations of free will. Because you **wanted** the best for that thing that was taken away from you (and now you can't provide that anymore), **or** you **wanted** not to suffer yourself because of the lack thereof.

It's all about free will.

Property is a word we use to talk about things that affect our free will.

But we don't really own anything here.

We only own our soul (the source of free will).

This has been studied by philosophers and theologians, and people that hoard stuff that other people need, just for the sake of it, don't really have a right to keep those things.

And I agree.

I can't accept that people suffer hunger because they can't have a plot of land to plant potatoes, while someone bought a mansion next to them, just to sit there and never use it, because they can. If the people that need to eat take it, I don't see that as a violation of any right, just common sense.

Just ignore me, I just think Milei is all talk no action, nothing will change in Argentina, just like nothing changed in Brazil with Bolsonaro or in the US with Trump.

Debt is through the roof everywhere and civil liberties are eroded relentlessly.

No, it's not about context. Sí and si are two different words.

Replying to Avatar yo

Lmao 🤣

but you have a gf