I can't argue, though personally I would flip Empire and A New Hope. Also, everything that happened after Jar Jar's first appearance is dead to me, so my list is only a list of 3.
Yeah, I'm not sure I remember anyone ever directly threatening him physically. I don't know what the context is vis-a-vis any assessment made by this other guy's video that you posted. I was just responding to what you said you were curious to see.
This might be the most succinct account (~7 min.) of the incident(s). If you're interested, there are much more detailed accounts that came out later that dive much deeper - but require much more of a time commitment to view.
I like to think I'd be able to wade through a fair amount of ad hominems to sift out the moments of sincere critique. False assertions of fact are a different matter.
Full Disclosure: I consume an awful lot of content by both Bret and Eric. I generally respect their opinions as a default position. So, I absolutely acknowledge my bias. However, I am eager to hear views that challenge my prior assumptions - even from someone who I'd never heard of before.
That being said, when that someone can't even make it 12 seconds without such an obvious misrepresentation as "self-appointed leaders of the intellectual dark web", they've lost the benefit of the doubt necessary to retain my attention any further.
"I thought SegWit and Taproot have always been part of Bitcoin" - said no one ever.
I suppose apps would then have to choose for themselves whether to support private DMs or remain in the app stores. Ultimately, there will always be clients that offer features that the authorities don't like.
So... 60 Minutes took the liberty of editing their interview with Kamala Harris - not just for clarity. They actually replaced one of her responses in its entirety with a shorter, slightly less incoherent response presumably clipped from some other part of the interview. Remember when 60 Minutes did journalism?; not just PR for the Democratic Party?
To be fair, it seems like EVERYONE forgot Joe Biden is still the President.
People still participate in Politics? #politics #joke
https://video.nostr.build/2e2a5db4a640478485e24dd1025c46b2b786f7a3ac7f700ee21dd1bca089224f.mp4
U.S. Elections Importance Chart:
Everything's good for jalapenos.
which seems ironic since price gouging can only actually exist where free-market competition has been prohibited - like when the government grants utility companies exclusive access to serve your home.
Florida Man for the win 🤙 https://video.nostr.build/3dfa733935519adecbf45715a7cf4c3a91b85c26afd0039edc5c21740db6b8b1.mp4
So, you're out in the rain with a bunch of electrical equipment to produce a report that you could easily shoot from a dry vantage point - and you choose to mock someone else who just wants to get a little exercise as 'Florida Man'. 🤷♂️
Just watched the whole thing. It's great until it goes off the rails in the last fifteen minutes. I think it's Roger Ver and Amir Taaki that sent the documentary maker chasing a ghost. They made RBF seem important, even suspecting it to be a government sabotage effort. This glorifies nostr:npub1ej493cmun8y9h3082spg5uvt63jgtewneve526g7e2urca2afrxqm3ndrm's image in his head, which Peter then openly exploited - while being very honest about doing so.
The bigger meta mistake the documentary maker made was to seek out people who enjoy being on TV. If he'd contacted experts in a more systematic way they would have ruined the plot. But this is more fun for everyone. nostr:note1w0679347vjl0sjny793aahr3k7cxzxjklrzqdd82dfatfe64m2rq97nkww
btw, if you extend the satoshi post just a little further: "... and the transaction fee is higher", it makes Peter's response just seem even more redundant. I wonder why they chose to clip it at the "..." like they did. 🤔
I loved how he implied this must have been Peter accidentally revealing himself while clarifying his own earlier satoshi post. I read it more as just the pedantic response of a smart-ass.