Avatar
freemymind 🇨🇭
b7cf9f42a796b091e843dce919d3ef4c0dc82e029452edf0bdbcdeb9ecb93e78
#daoist #voluntarist #anarchist #humanist #social #political #conversations #nonviolence How to learn my philosophy: Start with some critical thinking on youtube with "TEDed the deomon of reason" miniseries Start with Immanuel Kants techings, follow stoics, also very nice to read "happy" by Derren Brown, add dao techings to it Follow this up by Podcasts like Darknet diaries and Jon Harbinger On Youtube watch TEDx talks, Veritassium and Huberman Lab Chronically offended by The Beave 😎
Replying to Avatar HoloKat

It all depends how many beliefe this story.

Just to have one source:

https://kidshealth.org/en/parents/formulafeed-starting.html

Here they state:

"Do not try to make your own formula at home. Online recipes may look healthy and promise to be nutritionally complete, but they can have too little — or too much — of important nutrients and cause serious health problems for your baby."

Or a second source:

https://www.fatherly.com/parenting/parents-myths-baby-formula-science

"There are differences between breast milk and baby formula, but they have little to do with a child getting the appropriate amount of nutrition. The protein, energy, vitamins, and mineral content of baby formula has been closely regulated since the 1980s. Any baby formula sold is required to meet the same nutritional requirements to meet the needs of growing babies."

Maby this just shows that you do not try to find out what is good for the baby. You just want to promote your thoughts with some image as a source 😂🫣

First things first. The war is Russia against Ukraine.

I think for liberal states it should be cristal clear. The war has to be ended with big military power to make shure no Russian is left on Ukrainian land. With every other Result the message is out that any state in the world with nuclear weapons can attack and gain land and get international acceptance.

Replying to Avatar Neal

How?

For example by storming the event with Police. Or with a big countermovement to crash the event and publicly post the faces and names of the hosts.

I ask because I do not know a greate answer. But I think doing nothing is one of the worst responses of a liberal and just society.

Lets say in private. But we would know from several members, that today at the reunion it will be defined which houses to burn down and which people to kill.

Replying to 007ef24a...

Summary of As rioters fill overcrowded prisons, UK turns to police cells

nostr:nevent1qqs08z0m26vmvda8sqsuj7e7q0kztyycg30axtwpngfue65p8nwe9kqzyrevdx2twuwpf0n57u8m2w3w36vqcwrjngtnj343fufycr9ml56rqqcyqqqqqqgf7dg8v

Britain is facing a prison capacity crisis due to recent rioting arrests. To address the overcrowding issue, suspects will be held in police station cells until space is available in prisons. The justice system crisis, exacerbated by the pandemic, has led to tough decisions by the government. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's plan includes releasing prisoners earlier to alleviate overcrowding. The measures aim to increase prison capacity, particularly in the north of England, following misinformation about a suspect in a high-profile case.

Never forget that all the riots can not change the discussion to ona for or against immigration. We people with emotions and intellect should always ask our selve how to organize immigration. Maby it is more difficult. But it gives us the power to have in control a future we want to live in.

Question to free speech:

When a group meets to discuss a racist agression. To plan murders and attacks.

Can a working society allow this reunion to happen?

%not associated to a specific event. But rather a general question%

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0VjbvZpa4g

Calm intresting debate about defunding the police. It does not answer all the questions. But brings up good points to reflect on.

Replying to Avatar Den Yellek

I would again emplore you to read the book or at least the chapter I have linked earlier. All of these most common questions are answered.

I will post here the relevant section discussing this point:

"“But how could a poor person afford private protection he would have to pay for instead of getting free protection, as he does now?” There are several answers to this question, one of the most common criticisms of the idea of totally private police protection. One is: that this problem of course applies to any commodity or service in the libertarian society, not just the police. But isn’t protection necessary? Perhaps, but then so is food of many different kinds, clothing, shelter, etc. Surely these are at least as vital if not more so than police protection, and yet almost nobody says that therefore the government must nationalize food, clothing, shelter, etc., and supply these free as a compulsory monopoly. Very poor people would be supplied, in general, by private charity, as we saw in our chapter on welfare. Furthermore, in the specific case of police there would undoubtedly be ways of voluntarily supplying free police protection to the indigent — either by the police companies themselves for goodwill (as hospitals and doctors do now) or by special “police aid” societies that would do work similar to “legal aid” societies [p. 220] today. (Legal aid societies voluntarily supply free legal counsel to the indigent in trouble with the authorities.)

There are important supplementary considerations. As we have seen, police service is not “free”; it is paid for by the taxpayer, and the taxpayer is very often the poor person himself. He may very well be paying more in taxes for police now than he would in fees to private, and far more efficient, police companies. Furthermore, the police companies would be tapping a mass market; with the economies of such a large-scale market, police protection would undoubtedly be much cheaper. No police company would wish to price itself out of a large chunk of its market, and the cost of protection would be no more prohibitively expensive than, say, the cost of insurance today. (In fact, it would tend to be much cheaper than current insurance, because the insurance industry today is heavily regulated by government to keep out low-cost competition.)"

https://mises.org/online-book/new-liberty-libertarian-manifesto/chapter-12-public-sector-iii-police-law-and-courts/police-protection#:~:text=%E2%80%9CBut%20how%20could,low%2Dcost%20competition.)

You know that the free market itself only exists because law and order are enforced? The free market itself is against law and order and in no way enforcing it. The justice system is not some natural building that even exist without the justicial system that upholds it. And concouring security firms are like opponents in war. Its armed forces that have the will to be the only. So just destroy opponents. Since there is no force defending from it. And then comes maby an other force to do the same. Only that none of those has any democratic legitimacy.

But the name is not all that important. There is inevittable metadata that is difficult or impossible to hide. Your direction, your Face, your bodymeasures like fingerprint and other unique measures, your intrest, your profession, your education. Without Name you are not really more private. Only more diffidult to name maby. But that is for people. Not for any coorperations or surveillance.

I rather want to be identified eay by people. The concern is the state surveillance and big corporations for me.

Blown up story. But sorry this still is the reality that was before democracies came up. Ones with much power control everything and the poor do have nothing to say. People that have free speech to oppose the powerful are imprisoned or shot directly as they are in Russia, Northkorea or Belarus. Those are states that live with your reality. There is no legitimated state. But this does not result in mor equality or anything like it.