Avatar
Bayer
b9b12efdc52f2bbf331dfcc63459ac2012b47c8d1af4bda805ea66cce2944709
Bitcoiner learning Rust. Chaincode BOSS Alumni ____ Opinionated Bitcoin self-custody guides: https://www.wehodlbtc.com/ ____ Support Bitcoin developers donate to: https://opensats.org/ ____ GPG: 9CAA 541A 4DEB AB6E 9BE1 A7C8 2C5E 2CE6 0D27 4353
Replying to Avatar ODELL

The gents nostr:npub1mutnyacc9uc4t5mmxvpprwsauj5p2qxq95v4a9j0jxl8wnkfvuyque23vg Wallet are showing the world what is possible when you combine nostr and bitcoin.

The future is bright. 🫡

Yep the work that they are doing is absolutely amazing.

Lol a "more humane internet'" ... Solution: censor everyone but our army of trusted messengers. /facepalm

Yep its an absolute shit show of permission requests, popups and broken, JS heavy sites. Makes me tear up inside!

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

“We should change Bitcoin now in a contentious way to fix the security budget” is basically the same tinkering mentality that central bankers have.

It begins with an overconfident assumption that they know fees won’t be sufficient in the future and that a certain “fix” is going to generate more fees. But some “fixes” could even backfire and create less fees, or introduce bugs, or damage the incentive structure.

The Bitcoin fee market a couple decades out will primarily be a function of adoption or lack thereof. In a world of eight billion people, only a couple hundred million can do an on chain transaction per year, or a bit more with maximal batching. The number of people who could do a monthly transaction is 1/12th of that number. In order to be concerned that bitcoin fees will be too low to prevent censorship in the future, we have to start with the assumption that not many people use bitcoin decades out.

Fedwire has about 100x the gross volume that Bitcoin currently does, with a similar number of transactions. What will Bitcoin’s fee market be if volumes go up 5x or 10x, let alone 50x or 100x? Who wants to raise their hand with a confident model of what bitcoin volumes will be in 2040?

What will someone pay to send a ten million dollar equivalent on chain settlement internationally? $100 in fees per million dollar settlement transaction would be .01%. $300 to get it in a quicker block would be 0.03%. That type of environment can generate tens of billions of dollars of fees annually. The fees that people pay to ship millions of dollars of gold long distances, or to perform a real estate transaction worth millions of dollars, are extremely high. Even if bitcoin is a fraction of that, it would be high by today’s standards. And in a world of billions of people, if nobody wants to pay $100 to send a million dollar settlement bearer asset transaction, then that’s a world where not many people use bitcoin period.

In some months the “security budget” concern trends. In other months, the “fees will be so high that only rich people can transact on chain” concern trends. These are so wildly contradictory and the fact that both are common concerns shows how little we know about the long term future.

I don’t think the fee market can be fixed by gimmicks. Either the network is desirable to use in a couple decades or it’s not. If 3 or 4 decades into bitcoin’s life it can’t generate significant settlement volumes, and gets easily censored due to low fees, then it’s just not a very desirable network at that point for one reason or another.

Some soft forks like covenants can be thoughtfully considered for scaling and fee density, and it’s good for smart developers to always be thinking about low risk improvements to the network that the node network and miners might have a high consensus positive view toward over time. But trying to rush VC-backed softforks, and using security budget FUD to push them, is pretty disingenuous imo.

Anyway, good morning.

Thanks for articulating so well what I could not! This is dead on.

Replying to Avatar Kieran

Just deployed a massive redesign of Snort.

Say hello to Snort V2 design, huge shoutout to nostr:npub1r0rs5q2gk0e3dk3nlc7gnu378ec6cnlenqp8a3cjhyzu6f8k5sgs4sq9ac as usual.

https://void.cat/d/RGhg4innbi5cTEfgV1DReP.webp

https://void.cat/d/JkpX5fmKyzGwMASB54sLSU.webp

As usual there are a few rough corners but we should get to them very soon, if you notice anything glaring please let me know.

This redesign has been in progress for over 2 months, the PR changed almost every file in the project.

Just got back from a month hiatus. This looks great! Amazing work :)

Anyone know a trustworthy service that could potentially brute force a passphrase to a bip39 bitcoin wallet? User has all 12 words but they've lost their passphrase.

Thanks!

#bitcoin

Hmm good question, if they can and have the know how id say non kyc via hodl hodl

That looks damn good. Ever try ribeye and cast iron over and open fire, finished off with butter and rosemary? Camp fire adds a whole nother level of flavour.

Sauna is the goal. For now it's cold shower, workout and sunlight in the morning. Great way to get the morning started.

Replying to Avatar Lyn Alden

The Montana state legislature voted to ban TikTok in the state. The bill would prevent a company from allowing people in Montana to download the app.

https://leg.mt.gov/bills/2023/billpdf/SB0419.pdf

The bill states that the reasoning is because 1) China is an adversary to the U.S. and 2) TikTok promotes harmful behavior and collects data on users.

It was sponsored by a Republican and mostly passed by Republicans. Most Democrats opposed it but were outvoted. It still needs to be signed by the governor, and it would be open to court challenges.

I don't like TikTok, but that's not a promising snapshot for where lawmakers are in terms of software control.

it seems to me like regulators are taking the easy way out. Instead of trying to understand the problem from first principals, i.e., the app isn't the problem, the regulations around data protection and data gathering are.

As well as pushing for more education regarding our digital footprint and the data we leave behind. Also possibly an age limit on downloading certain apps, similar to how you cannot vote, drink, drive a car etc until a certain age. If we believe that social media apps have negative health/life consequences (which i believe they do) then we as a society should think twice when allowing our kids to be exposed to them, just as we do with the above examples.

There's a reason tech CEOs do not let their kids use these apps.

The grass is always greener isn't it? Instead of fixing the inherent problems with our current system (which has brought us so much good) we rather try something else. It's easier to throw everything away then to fix what's broken. We need more proof of work, dedication and self-discipline in this world. We need to stop running away from our problems and tackle them head on like adults.

#[0] 's new premium member report is out where she discusses the current macro environment, the bitcoin/crypto landscape and does a deep dive in the pharmaceuticals sector.

Absolutely one of the best newsletters for the cost. All signal no noise. highly recommend checking it out. And if you can't spare some sats, then she's got a ton of free well researched articles to read through.

lynalden.com

LOL, that looks and sounds awful.

That being said, coffee is good, bacon fat is good! How did this not turn into something good?!