bc
nobody
bc28e051e1f07511aed2c0e8f115d9732cb504708b9a9ba35b98c414cc007e97
account deleted
Replying to Avatar corndalorian

hahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahahahahhahahahahahhahaha

....wheeze....

hahahahahahhahahahhahahahha.

that's ridiculous.

Replying to Avatar jack

Subtle

i don't like the font.

it should. those relying on the content production of creators, and never create anything unique or interesting obviously love open roadmaps to stealing and capitalising on the proof of work of others. i operate free&fair_use because there's no other efficient method to efficiently navigate the data theft apparatuses, remain independent, and still be productive. the main reason behind the writer's strike is rooted in this - there's very little efficacy in keeping original pow data private during development in a smart tuned environment anymore. i have built identity from it, but i have made no financial profits; if i ever wanted to publish a unique piece i could use that notoriety to extract actual value from a traditional system - maybe. i have not sold anything or collaborated in any ways which generates actual useful profits. all claims of collaborating are completely bogus and opportunist except for the treehouse and even those are indirect. my time and content is all donated - not because i like the mining community, but because it's the most effective method of navigating wild. if i was not independently wealthy in practical way - my practice as it is currently would not be sustainable.

scraping is data and identity data theft. jargon protects predatory models.

curious what the data discovery is on the businesses employing square and their ratings within the square model? does square run analytics on the integrity of those using their data and financial programs since their models and methods feed the square ecosystem? based on the local use of square, i wonder about how we as consumers trust the businesses using and capturing our data - not just square. there's a lot of bounty activity running around square's safeguards...... maybe the bounty hunters need some validator authentication done on them. it's only fair. and when they dislike it: it might adjust the lens of the "permissionless" discovery absolutists.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_McKelvey

🥖🥖🥖. glad you enjoyed it. "dm me" for details, smartass.

Replying to Avatar jack

Uh huh

until podcasters make public all of the funding and dark money influence driving their interview agendas - i think podcasting should be "flung into the arno".

you just need a good fucking. that will get your amperage right up. 😁

who doesn't answer? 🍎

seriously.

got a loooooong way to go to get the jargon and rhetoric unraveled. because this pos is "designing" ai regulation. if you fucking think calling for regulation will manifest anything useful, waste 10 minutes of your life on this video and get back to me. challenge: i dare you to sit through it, not swear, and not throw your device.

https://youtu.be/S5MW2aRc4ac

Replying to Avatar Jestopher

you don't still believe this crap, do you? for a bunch of dissenting agitators nerds, there's a lot of delusional content y'all promote and wax poetic about.

Replying to Avatar jack

Oh boy

fences don't work.