Profile: bdd85e32...
I have. In my experience the combination that Vitor is advocating effectively beats the other. Discipline and perseverance beats raw untrained talent. Literature, like the one behind the 10.000 hours sustaind that claim while the oppossite seems unsubstantiated and just uninformed personal opinion.
I'm. It's just that in the past I have read interesting justified and even cotrarian opinions from you and I thougth this could be an integrating one. Never mind.
Any details? Just to understanding better and beyond "based on personal but untold observations ..."
I don't know who anyone of those names are. And I have the feeling that, in my case, this is a good qualifier for being focused. Of course, for others could mean the opposite.
I've never used GPT, so I would write it myself.
I think we need a more critical approach towards the so called "Artificial Intelligence" (I prefer the term #ApparentIntelligence ). Promising efforts are being done in the Feminist AI:
https://feministai.pubpub.org/
We try looking at AI in dialogue with such approaches, with my undergrad and post grad students.
I understand. Doing a complete critical reading sometimes hurts. Particularly when it goes against our feelings and ideologies. I would love to read your peer reviewed contrasted and opposing literature. Mostly when personal opinions are pretty cheap in the age of noisy social media.
But this exchange illustrated my point: Nostr and Bitcoin seem so entangled that using the first to criticize the second gets a swift ideological response. That, ultimately reduces the growing of Nostr to Bitcoin adherents, making difficult transport lessons, like the one related to thinking/designing beyond artificial scarcity, that nostr:npub1gcxzte5zlkncx26j68ez60fzkvtkm9e0vrwdcvsjakxf9mu9qewqlfnj5z was talking about at the beginning of this thread.
Awwww... What a cute ungrounded delusion š« ! Seems that you have not read serious peer reviewed literature:
This is why I think that the prevalence of #Bitcoin tech bro discourse over here is so harmful, as creates the apparent and false idea that the only way to think and talk about economies over here is from the point of view of the artificial scarcity in Bitcoin alike blockchains, while ignoring its ecological costs and damages.
Heh, he. Yeahh the real life Lex Luthor šš
TIL Stripe prohibits their customers to sell bitcoin mining hardware ā”ļø
Source: https://stripe.com/legal/restricted-businesses
Tweet: https://x.com/btc_archive/status/1747191113616601355?s=46&t=P9bVaXQrvY85ZrRyepnQTQ 
I'm sympathize with restrictions on wasteful computing and its selling. The planet has long endured the consequences of economic freedom beyond ecological sustainability.
On the contrary, I think that a richer and more diverse Nostr would be celebrated by decoupling it from Bitcoin and the unfortunate crypto bro discourse around it..
https://youtu.be/4MIESbBnA2k?si=N0EK9gu4SvpAyPK9
Well this is terrifying. Sounds like we desperately need the overlap in journalism and scientists to stop this WHO takeover. How did we get here? We may need to get really French and bring back the chop machine.
I would say that what Tucker has been doing since decades is far away from journalism.
I use it, but I coined my own alternative meaning: Apparent Intelligence.
I van relate. It happens to me with many English friendly names that are difficult to pronounce in Spanish, despite of the way the langua have spread in the Global South or maybe in resistance against such expansion.
Interesting take on autonomy. But, I think that the like for Nostr and Bitcoin can be orthogonal, liking one but not the other, both or none. It happens with me for sure and while I like decentralized communication protocols with eventually convergent blockchains (like Nostr or Scuttlebutt), but find most of the Bitcoin talk "tech broty" and ecologically unaware/unconscious.