Avatar
pico4
bf193598a94e622aa3373e88d06d057f71a8ba21cb8ef4e3f93f6246ce46def6

Happy new year 🥳

What’s with all these accounts that mention me while announcing $ZAPS or $PRIMAL or any other scam coin? I block every single one of them yet they keep appearing

Merry Christmas everyone 🎅

Replying to Avatar Gigi

It's insane to me that the Epstein files are used as a political football by both parties, as well as the voter base of both parties. "Look! Clinton is in the files!" says the red shirt. "Look! Trump is in the files!" says the blue shirt.

It shouldn't matter. Unspeakable things were done to underage girls (and boys) over a long period of time. Incredibly powerful people were (and are) involved. Politicians are implicated across the aisle, obviously, as are three-letter agencies. Some of the kids are ~5yrs old. Some of the photos show toddlers. What the fuck? "Disgusting" doesn't even begin to describe the situation. How broken is the current landscape if the only lens this is viewed through is the political lens?

One thing is worth remembering, however. It used to be a "conspiracy theory". Only a few months ago, talking heads and politicians would try to convince the public that there's no such thing as the Epstein files. Some high-ranking officials said as much under oath, even. What happened to perjury? Is it just a fancy word in today's day and age? I doubt that anyone will go to jail (except to commit "suicide"). And while perjury is a severe crime by most standards, it pales in comparison to what must have happened on the so-called "Lolita Express" that travelled so often to the "Virgin Islands". Oh, how funny. All these names. It would be comical if it wouldn't be so sad. Diabolical, even.

U.S. politics is a joke. The idea of justice as well as the legal system increasingly feels like a joke too. Innocent people are being jailed. Corrupt politicians and other officials are roaming free, because ... what? They are too powerful? Too influential? The system would destabilize too much if things would come to light?

Justitia holds a balance and a sword for a reason, and she wears a blindfold for a reason too. Today's reincarnation has no sword, no blindfold, and the balance she holds is obviously NOT using honest weights and measures.

What a laughable attempt at "transparency". I would laugh if it wouldn't be so horribly, horribly sad.

funded by the taxes we pay by the way. Stopping paying them is the only reasonable solution.

Siempre lo he pensado, y creo que justo por eso dejan a la gente salir a celebrar el mundial de fútbol, o la final de la champions. Es un destrozo que debería ser controlado por las fuerzas de seguridad, pero dejándolo pasar por esa noche se aseguran de mantenernos divididos en equipos manejables y nos quitan las fuerzas para salir a armar un destrozo cuando de verdad es necesario.

Proton, NordVPN, brilliant… I see hundreds of ads praising them and that makes me suspicious about it. Somethings off

This is key.

They cannot force me to go to war, what are they gonna do, give me a gun? I’ll defend myself with it. Take me to jail? Shelter and food, even better than war.

The only factor “forcing” (convincing) people to go fight in the trenches is social status. They know social pressure is a very powerful tool and the use it. When they need peple fighting for the country they lift up soldiers into a higher status level: Discounts for veterans, discounts for soldiers and their family, wage raises, custom housing and life saving plans, and culture and movies praising the “bravery” inside war. Not to mention the social rejection targeted towards deserters. It’s all rigged to make us crave it.

You can transact with and validate bitcoin without the internet, the connectivity is only required for reaching a consensus on the order in which all transactions happened. And if you want you can go offchain with opendime or satscard.

Bitcoin’s blockchain size is already growing at 4x the usual rate with the segwit implementation, but it is linear, allows lightning and is compatible with the older consensus. It is something I am willing to dedicate storage space to. I do not want to store useless dust that grows exponentially with more shitty projects using bitcoin instead of an already established infrastructure on coins like ETH.

I LOVE popcorn

I understand your point, it may seem unfair that 5 accounts with many followers create a small group that massively impact your reach. But the group in question is “people following the ones who don’t want to listen to you”. What do you think would happen if this feature did not exist, people magically tolerating your opinion? Mute list, as a system, existed long ago before nostr, and for one simple reason. There are not a nostr dev decision, but a needed social protocol.

Grow the SAME followers in five accounts simultaneously? All of this for something that can be countered by you creating a new npub or rotating your existing one. Does not make sense, in my honest opinion.

It is already difficult for me to mute some automated accounts that rotate their npubs frequently. Me, a single npub, unable to control my feed. Controling others with five different accounts and it being effective? I don’t think so. Not practical, and not enforced in any way.

And, I wanna stretch this out, even if this was the case, they are NOT censoring you. They are just not listening to you anymore. They are not limiting your reach to people who wants to listen to you. I have the right to listen to anyone I want, and everyone has the right to speak to anyone they want. But that doesn’t add up to you having the right to being listened by people who don’t want to.

That’s a good point, muting an account mutes all their interactions, not only the bad ones (considered bad by whoever blocks you, not objectively bad). But it can be fixed by creating a different account and using it to talk about lightning, without it affecting your search.

“or I get so many followers I can put pressure on the people that lied to her in the first place”

…so you want to do to others what you are fighting against for in this thread? gain followers and use that to enforce pressure on others speech.

I really hope you find Digit and get to talk to them again. But I honestly think you are not being censored in any way. You are just not reaching parts of the network that did not mind about your goals in the first place. Even if they could see you, It would not help in your search.

same result you would get even if this was not a client feature, I’m afraid. For every “soft block” made by web of trust there are 5 people who directly blocked you. You would only stop being blocked for 1/5 of the total.

Who is digit?

I keep saying it because it is not censorship. No one is globally removing your posts or silencing you in any way. The fact that we are talking in this thread proves it.

It is not filtered for “many users”. It is filtered for the small groups of users when 5 or more people of the group decide to personally block you.

That means Bearetta is following five accounts that muted that message, and the app muted it for her as a recommendation. It can be disabled by the user, and it does not affect users which dont follow the same accounts. I get your point, if someone creates 5 accounts they can mute a message for their connections, but this only works if their client is configured with this option, and if you make someone follow 5 different fake accounts. It is not censorship

Y basta con estigmatizar btc autocustodiado, algo tan simple como decir que el btc en los exchanges está “limpio” y “regulado” para plantar la idea de que un btc autocustodiado es malo y se le cedan herramientas de control. Si crees que es “distópico” o de “1984” piensa en lo que ya han conseguido hasta ahora. Lavar tu coche en la calle es ilegal, pero es legal hacerlo en autolavado. Que el sistema sea libre no significa que no puedan usar estratagemas para controlar su libre uso.

just what the banks want, fractional-reserve bitcoin, paper bitcoin. Can’t wait for the excuse they are gonna use to detach paper btc from the real btc backing it to end up in the same situation we are already in with FIAT.

this is exactly why they want to add ID KYC to social media by the way. They cannot afford people organising and forming important pressure groups that end up turning down the agenda/propaganda of the state. They want to hold people accountable for having any opinion that does not work with their interests.