i also don’t trust anyone to make mute report/mute decisions on my behalf. I would maybe delegate that to one or two other crazy trusted person, but even then.

In more-speech I differentiate between follow and trust. I trust my contacts. I follow people and threads by collecting the events in filtered tabs.

From: manime<-mazin at 05/08 12:27

> Yes. And. Followed != trusted.

>

> So WoT on Nostr will need better measure of “trust” to THEN provide the backbone for transparency and choice in the algos applied. Working on this also… for social onboarding.

> nostr:note1ta9gzmtewn7jnslhjd8ew9322qp3rnyc56e9a0rj9f0x2ftndxhqcy7dwt

CC: #[4]

CC: #[5]

CC: #[6]

Simple but effective! I like this, you blend in better this way

Anybody know of any good Domain registrars that are pro-privacy?

please, any suggestions welcome.

#privacy

#domains

I disagree.

Wot can only lead to an echo chamber because even if you use the most permissible slidder setting then all the signal of quality will still come from the people you already know. Anything outside of that will be swamped out by noise.

Pow is a universal signal of quality (just a signal not a guarrantee). That makes it possible to trancend then limitations of your current wot

If spam is not economically viable, pow works. I think spam is not economically viable. Its not a working advertising method.

Possible it's not the right word but I meant the kinds of insular communities that exist on places like reddit. Where you see only posts that agree with you (everything else is downvoted) and are not allowed to say anything that deviates from the group's ideological biases (or you will be expelled/unfollowed).

Other similar terms are: echo chambere, circle j*rks, etc.

zaps are the universal like count!

Many people in that generation are already using it.

What do you guys think about DID that Micro Strategy is proposing/introducing. Didn't quite have the brwinpower to fully concentrate when I watched the presentation but was furious how that is being received and perceived as a potential future online.

You mean 1 pays, and then redistributes. Or no differentiation between 2 paying users?

Some people think Nostr cannot work with things like a "universal consistent like count" and other basic social media malignant tumors.

Even if we ignore the bad psychological and societal effects of such practices and assume they are good, and even if we assume that Nostr is all running in a single server that has all the events (a Bluesky-like unavoidable requirement for such universal consistency) these people are still completely oblivious to the fact that anyone can create a bazillion keypairs and spam like counts.

So when they ask for a "universal consistent like count" what these people are really asking for is for a centralized KYC barrier at the doors of Nostr that ensures only a single keypair can be created by each human.