You said they're have a herbivorous digestive system, which is false
Did I say we are carnivores? No. I said omnivorous, learn to read. And while at it, read something about the evolution of human diet and compared anatomy.
Fiber is good for the digestion precisely because it doesn't breakdown and soaks up water, which helps with the expulsion of the feces.
I've never seen a monkey chasing a cow, but I've seen chimps eating insects, hunting small mammals and birds, and even cannibalizing other chimps after beating them to death. You seem to imply you don't think humans and chimps have a common ancestor, which is an even more retarded take than humans having a herbivorous digestive system.
You want to give good advice's about healthy diet? Simple, don't tell people to be vegan
Never thought Mitch McConnell announcing his retirement would cause such a Bitcoin flash crash. The more you learn...
nostr:npub153xmex42x4chdf757hp3q6zxagykkek7pdgwuwd074964dkyha9s82ryu8 makes wine (Peony Lane). He has some BTC vintages
Did you pull the rug out of the shop by any chance?
Jk, we all need to buy stuff every now and then. It just, retroactively, got way more expensive
The Salt-o-meter is beeping like a Geiger counter in Chernobyl
He must think he's fucking Gandhi or something
This gif cracks me every time
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=995x1134&blurhash=%7B9Rp8-%7Eq%7EqWB%252RjxuM_D%25j%5B%3Fbt7NGayt7WB-%3B4nofxuRjxuofoz%3FbD%25WB-%3BxuWBRjj%5B-%3BIUM%7B%25MM%7BayM%7BWBofogofRiM%7Bxuj%5BM%7BD%25-%3BxuIURjM%7BxuWBM%7B-%3BM%7BM%7Bt7IUayxvjsofxuM%7BRjt7Rjj%5D&x=520a9c08181cedfa4aea936a34dcc7b80314a1d4baf8be53c8f86fe74d6ee797
It's only sell from here. Sell fiat for sats, sell sats for goods and services.
They can eat whichever way the want, but saying you have the digestive system of a herbivore is like saying the sun rises from the west, simply false.
And yes, mass meat production is real and is bad. But that doesn't make people eating meat some sort of cruel, soulless cunts either.
It would be easier for people to understand if we changed every other unit and we left the currency the same.
Your buck still buys a foot of chocolate bar, but the foot of 2024 was called an inch back in 1980.
Sorry to break this for you, but your digestive system is not that of a herbivore.
You don't have a multi-chamber stomach, you dont have a fully flattened dentition, you don't have a gap between you incisives and your molars to help with the grinding of vegetable fibers, you are not bringing your half-digested food from your stomach to your mouth to chew on it again, you lack several meters of intestines for processing leaf and other vegetable materials, and your gut microbiota is not adapted to process only vegetables. You have a digestive system designed to follow a omnivorous diet, everything in your body points towards that.
When you look throughout human evolution, brain size increases are highly correlated with an increase in animal protein consumption. Since protohumans abandoned a fruit based diet, with sporadic supplements of insects and other animal proteins, the animal content of the diet kept increasing right until ~10K years ago. Then, it quickly shifted to grain based diets. This shift has been so sudden that our bodies are not properly adapted to the high amounts of carbohydrates we consume nowadays. Artificial selection of high cabrs content plants, and a less active life have enhanced the detrimental effects this swift change has.
So, if you follow the millions of years of evolution your body tells, you should have a omnivorous diet with high levels of animal protein, supplemented vegetables, out of which only fruit should be high carbs.
If you don't want to follow that diet based on some cow hugging beliefs, fine. But don't bullshit yourself telling you that your body is something it isn't.
If you weren't such a bear, you could see how I'm shitting on you over Nostr... 🤷♂️
Imho, the main problem isn't censorship, but rather how absolutely broken and utterly scammy the whole peer-review system currently is.
First, it's important to note most of the research worldwide it's funded with public money.
When publishing, researchers face a choice. Either go for a closed-access journal, which requires giving the copyrights of the paper to the publisher, or pay several grand in publishing costs to publish in an open-access journal.
If they chose the former, then the institutions that have funded the research have to pay a subscription to the journal to have access to the research they have funded. If they chose the later, then researchers have to waste research funds in paying an overpriced "publication fee".
To make things worse, most open-access journals are owned by the same companies that own the closed-source ones, so essentially you either pay them up front, or on a delayed basis. This is public money payed, to a select few companies, to have/guarantee public access to research funded with public money.
If this wasn't scammy enough, researchers have to review their peers' papers to validate the quality and veridity of their research. "To ensure professional and unbiased reviews" the review process has no economic compensation. Instead, researchers are incentivized to review peers' papers by the publishers' predisposition to preferentially publish "collaborating authors". Essentially, researchers are forced by publishers into unpaid work to guarantee a "fair chance" at seeing their work published. Since this is considered a normal part of the researchers' work, it is often carried out during normal working hours. This means that the publishers are outsourcing the labor, and associated costs, which is once again being paid for with public money destined to research.
In summary, public money is being used to carry out the research, to publish and/or access the research, and to review the research. All while the publishers drain a good chunk of the funds in one of the most profitable, well established and long-lasting scams ever created.
Fixing this shitshow requires more than an uncensorable platform to host papers and datasets. It requires a complete refurbishment of the peer-review system.
The fact that they charge almost 40K for a wallet is laughable.
ECB Reports Record Loss for 2023, Publishes Another Hit Piece on Bitcoin
- "The ECB is likely to incur further losses over the next few years as a result of the materialisation of interest rate risk, before returning to making sustained profits. The ECB can operate effectively and fulfil its primary mandate of maintaining price stability regardless of any losses."
- "Bitcoin has failed on the promise to be a global decentralised digital currency and is still hardly used for legitimate transfers. The latest approval of an ETF doesn’t change the fact that Bitcoin is not suitable as means of payment or as an investment."
https://www.nobsbitcoin.com/ecb-reports-record-loss-for-2023-says-bitcoin-has-failed/
Imagine owning the money printer and still ending up with net losses lmao
Google's Anti-white AI is meme inspiring NGL
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1553x1494&blurhash=%7CgFO_vM%7Boft7ozR*fjf8of%7EqV%5BWVofofWBofa%7Bj%5B_3WBoLj%5Bj%5Bf6fkj%5Bj%5B%3FbkCkCf6f7j%5BjuoLWUtRt7ofWBf6s%3Bf6j%5Bf8oLt7ayWAayofWVWBfPoKofj%5BWBaykCaxj%5BfQRjofayayayj%5Bfkayj%5BRjayWBoLfQWBj%5Bjsof&x=047cbe2fb495f9e03f34b1564143961963f171350308c4d9ed7d5455bc9c8148
#m=image%2Fjpeg&dim=1080x1124&blurhash=%7CTRMVkWA_Na%7D%25MxuIURiRj%3FbWBIUofRPWBtRkCt7.8kCM%7BaeM_Rjt8xut7M_ofRjRj-%3Bt7RjaxM%7BxuRjRjt7WBofogRjofD%25WB%25gt7RPRjM%7Bofxuj%5Bt7WBM%7Bj%5Doft7ofRjWBoft7RjM%7Boft7ayay-%3BRjIAxu%25MV%40RjayWB&x=0c57122f63acb118cb641c62e93fd3633be1e6b5647fb401f131bf22d1dec297
#memestr #gemini #google #plebchain