Avatar
DireMunchkin
d986b8a48cef4950fc62f7dc2e0d277ca505757b5aa73f0959b20659e71f7cac
Swedish expat, living in Switzerland. Bitcoin class of 2021.

I have a mini PC hooked up to my TV that I use as media player and home server.

The home server runs Jellyfin to collect my media. Then I have Sonar, AutoBRR and qBittorrent to download them.

Replying to Avatar Toxic Bitcoiner

https://youtu.be/75Azta2EDoI

In the short term, a Bitcoin reserve won’t help to shrink the debt or facilitate fiscal responsibility. Just the opposite. With a reserve, NGU will allow them to issue even more Ponzi-slave coupons, which will be used for more plunder and murder. Bitcoin isn’t meant to help the State, it’s meant to kill the State…which it will eventually, as reservation demand for Bitcoin overtakes that of bonds and cash.

Granted, they’re going to do whatever they want, regardless of what we say. Bitcoin is for enemies. But for yourself, maybe reconsider what you advocate for.

One one hand: The state has no legitimately owned property. This includes the Bitcoin that'll be in a strategic reserve.

On the other hand: This helps monetize Bitcoin, which accelerates the timeline to demonetizing government debt. Thus making future deficit spending and devaluation (theft) of savers impossible.

Based on the latter point I still thinks it's good to advocate for. Even if it does mean NgU will benefit the state as well in the short to medium term.

GM Jeff! Half the time I zap you it's something to do with MLS and the other half it's the alps 😄

The loan liquidation mechanism involves two different shitcoins: Solana and LavaUSD.

Making a Godfrey Elwick esque parody account on bluesky with the same name is absolutely hilarious, good job sir 😂

Yeah fuck Soundcloud, they banned my account because I used a VPN. Use Spotify instead, it's much better in every way.

No, WoT filtering and mute words both work. I'm using Coracle right now and won't see any comment spam even if it starts again.

I've used Robosats before but I don't have the patience to complete orders manually with a human instead of an automated market maker. There have been times when I've had the best order on Robosats by premium and it still goes unfilled for like 4h+. On an exchange a buy order takes less than a second. The difference between my order completes in several days vs instantaneously is too big.

Also I withdraw all my bitcoin after buying them, so exchange failure is not a risk I'm worried about.

Not everything needs a business model - Non-commercial FOSS is also a viable option. I generally think companies are preferable, because they're self sustaining. But sometimes you can't combine the software with a business model. Mutiny is an excellent example of being "high risk / low reward" (I.E risk going to jail for cents on the dollar of micropayments).

Nostr is doing just fine with almost only being FOSS - We already know a lot of people will just develop clients for themselves and run relays pro bono. I have no worries there.

nostr:nevent1qqs83fyk9ufdpwehvecfm0l664a4gqx4zhu543yeg3hzhdvcch43lqq6h8pyj

Replying to Avatar Sjors Provoost

More generally, I agree with James' observation that Bitcoin Core devs are paying much less attention to soft forks than they used to.

I can only speak for myself here. Part of the problem is that the current proposals don't excite me, yet. That's even after spending time at the op_next conference.

SegWit (which happened before I was involved) brought the promise of Lightning. Taproot lets you build cold storage with hidden fallback options.

I'm still waiting for MuSig2 to finally have broad adoption, something that's higher on my review list than new soft forks, and I barely get to it.

In that light, talk of a vault soft fork seems premature. The tool development is too far behind even for forks that already activated.

Similarly congestion control doesn't excite me. I'm general I'm skeptical of claims that the masses are suddenly going to self-custody because of a dramatic event in US politics. Especially given that plenty of other countries are in worse shape and we don't see self custody blossom at a scale where it causes congestion. The US is 5% of the world population.

That's not to say that I'm against these ideas. If I see other people work on and activate them in a competent and careful manner I might be fine with it. It's sad that their main proponents and developers burned out, and that certainly won't speed things up. Maybe grants tailored for potential soft fork devs can help here, as long as the right expectations are set.

But not being opposed does not reach the bar of me actively reviewing it, which is part of what pushes things forward.

If I see a more fleshed out design for a (BitVM powered?) sidechain with unilateral (no 1 of N nonsense) exit that gives me full privacy (Shielded CSV?), that would get me more excited. Especially if it's clear which specific opcodes are best to get there.

Other devs will have other things and other thresholds that get them out of their soft-fork winter sleep. There's a "I know it when I see it" aspect to this too.

All that said, it might be the case that one day every single core dev is excited about a soft fork proposal, or would be if they read enough about it, yet is too distracted by their day to day focus. But I'm not sure if that is really what's happening. nostr:note1579fauj8nwl38mvzle5fkupswjw6fkzqv4syupav8ckshujy24tsks9y3h

Agreed, especially on the false urgency. I do think vaults are cool as a final get-out-of-jail card to prevent my stack from getting stolen. But we can spend a few more years hashing out covenant proposals IMO.