LN that is.
Yeah, I was joking about how tenacious monero stans are.
I didn't say it does. It does more useful things.
Great now there's gonna be pics of anime girls and diatribes about fungibility blowing up these comments...
I will check those out. Thanks for the suggestions.
Essential minimum?
A phone (preferably GrapheneOS)
Raspi4 full node
Essential Preferred?
3- miniPCs (1 full node, 1 lightning node, 1 QubesOs wallet, password manager)
1- GrapheneOS phone
1- Innocuous NFC object
1 to 3- HWW of different manufacturers
1- Portable mini thermal printer
2- [secret projects I am working on]
And as many bitaxes as comfortable.
Upon my reading, it says they unwind their involvement with chivo. It still exists. It just can't be run by the government.
I mean, okay. Even if the main way people use Bitcoin is through a bank, it's auditable, immutable, scarce, and has to be used within the consensus rules. The Bank's incentives align to be honest actors because they take transaction fees by running the routing nodes. Charging too much, you switch to a cheaper bank. The point is that Bitcoin doesn't solve the problem of people, it just makes them play more fairly.
Lol, I meant just Hell and Eternal torment but thank you for being thorough. I believe that the separation from Love is an unending torment. I don't think Hell is a specific place. Only that is a place that is separate from God.
2. I don't really stress about my bitcoin now so I am not sure that I would then either. But, not to change the stipulation of the hypothetical, I would live with stress before ever selling a valuable asset for a liquid currency hemmoraging value. Plus any more bitcoin I can leave to my kids is worth more than my comfort.
Am I missing where the IMF said bukele couldn't buy BTC with the loan? No taxes on BTC, the popular app will no longer be govt controlled, the government has more restrictions on how THEY spend their BTC, BTC use is voluntary now, I am trying to see the bummer here. Maybe I missed it.
Seems like a way to pay their miners without actually finding blocks consistently. Consequently, siphoning more hashrate away from other pools with bigger guaranteed payouts.
So, I guess that seems scummy, so that's why I wouldn't like to see them doing both.
I mean, yeah I have literally modeled that out. It's not hard at all.
Basically a federated model of both communities and bank to vendor ecospheres.
Community goes:
Individual->local shops
Local shops-> regional shops
Regional-> State
State-> Country
Bank federated model:
Individual-> local bank
Local Bank-> local shops & regional banks
Regional banks-> regional shops & state banks
In this model likely people would run custodial bank lightning software your "Bank account" is just your receiving channel (direct deposit paycheck) and a spending channel (likely equal to your paycheck as collateral)
The community solution is more sovereign bit most people don't care about sovereignty.
So, that's how it scales globally. (Sorry if this isn't detailed enough, I just don't want to retype an idea I have shared many times)
I guess I just see lightning, especially after the implementation of BOLT12 to be the most naturally scaling Layer 2 solution.
No token obfuscation,
HTLC to lock up BTC,
revocation secrets keep everyone honest,
Scales up and down as the financial flows call for it,
Better anonymity than a separate traceable block chain,
And most widely used now.
Sidechains, drivechains, and minted ecash seem interesting and have their use cases but if we are talking instant P2P transactions, with very low risk of ever getting rugged by a channel partner or fees bidding up on another chain, Lightning seems first in best dressed. I will say pathing needs some developer love but, that is the only gripe I've ever had with it.
It makes more sense to wait for banks to integrate lightning if you don't want to run a node. Which by the way is literally just having a PC run some software. If you think THAT is unimaginable for the average person, I guess CBDCs are in your future.
Aren't they a mining pool? Why are they buying BTC when they should be mining it?
Peter Schiff: World's Central Banks Are Starting Inflation Again
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/peter-schiff-worlds-central-banks-are-starting-inflation-again
Starting? They never stop baby!
Okay after reading on it, it seems to just be what people call a one way peg. And the way people are using "one way peg" is essentially misunderstanding what a monetary asset it. "Burning a token" when it transfers to another blockchain is a consumptive act. Money cannot be consumed (if it has monetary premium). Money is an asset that's sole purpose is to represent value and as a good is not meant to be consumed.
That is a term that doesn't make sense to me in my economist brain. "Two way peg" evokes in my mind that a token representing a claim on an asset can be asserted into existence therefore creating more of the asset. The inverse is possible but not the latter. Maybe I need to see some praxis on this but the term on it's face seems to not make sense. Coupons can only be pegged to the asset.


