Why is this not a DM. I get transparency and all that but some things (like honest mistakes need not be litigated in public)
Quite a few of us are, now. Lol. 😎
Lol, I knew about that I mean my example was hypothetical. I didn't want to just make an obscure case the basis of my argument.
I mean, I agree. But you know, logically, Anarchy is an ideology like E=MC² is an ideology. Yeah, it's an idea but like, that's how it works. Natural truths and all that.
Hypothetical. I am saying we need more clients for Nostr BUT if I FUD a shitty client, that doesn't make me a hypocrite.
Not mutually exclusive. If Someone built a client that stole your Nsec i would FUD TF out of it.
Anarchy is literally how the world operates. Your rulers hold their place through your complicity. The world is in anarchy right now, and America is just the biggest warlord with the most dangerous enforcers. The natural state of being is you own yourself and any claim to anyone else hinges on their compliance.
Minarchy is the fat kid saying "just a bite of cake" while possible, is very unlikely. On top of that, any amount of cake is not necessary for the nourishment of one's body.
Madlad filming.
That is not sharing a UTXO it's delayed settlement of a transaction but you know that. and I get it, I don't want to debate this nonsense either.
So to parse the answer out of the implications that I don't know about the privacy concerns: if privacy is not achieved on the base layer the asset fails as a monetary asset and ultimately is not useful as a global value store.
I personally see privacy as a function of medium of exchange (where it matters most) which is firmly in the layer 2 application. We've had two cracks at enabling layer 2 compatibility. Both have had knock-on effects and unintended consequences. I believe CTV is no different. But the trade off seems so short sighted, I can't believe no one is looking down the road that it would pave. "Shared UTXOs" have no economic analogue beside some communist ideal. You either own something or you don't. But that's an entire tangent.
The point is you don't need to change consensus rules to maintain the underlying asset (beside the Unix time code parms) to enable more private payments, transactions, or layer 2 functions. The calls made to the base layer should only transfer UTXOs from one set of addresses to another. All other functions can be abstracted to the second layer. Look at it this way: [0,1] <-you don't need to change this to do complex calcs in a system. You just need to build hex on top of it and assembly on that, and language on top of that. Stop trying to alter the rules of binary to make things easier, it might break everything already built on binary.
I treat it like any other thought. In my visualization space I just acknowledge it and watch it float away. I don't know whether the tickle goes away or if my mind just blocks it out but it vanishes from my consciousness.
1.) When you think of them and don't immediately have a need to see or call them. (That for me was quite a long time)
2.) It's a tough call in a parasocial environment. But I would say (if you are a really strong person looking to feel more normal) immerse yourself in memories of them until you feel terrible but not suicidal. Then give yourself at least a month to try to not think of them. Then when you are ready to immerse yourself again, don't just look through pictures or a video and realize you don't feel terrible like you did before. That good feeling of a beautiful memory with them leads you to feel good when a fleeting memory goes through your mind instead of the spiral it likely is right now.
That's the best I've got, lost my dad in '07 and that's what I did. I hope you have an easier time than I did.
Believe me, I have two foldables, they aren't worth it. You essentially keep it on one mode. Samsung's was mostly left open, Google fold was mostly closed. This thing I don't even know, perpetual treasure map mode?
I dunno what if he gets in a fight between Milijan and Will? Then my feed will definitely be less awesome.😉
Yes. There are many cool uses there. Like I said, a use is not a solution to a problem. I would just like the problem to be stated. Is the problem with bitcoin that there aren't payment pools and that catastrophic failure going to ruin the technology? Or is it a feature(use) that people would really like? This is my concern. That these things are simply being added because they would be nice NOT that they are integral to bitcoin's success.
I don't use Damus because I don't use Apple products. Waiting on that Android port.
I mean, this is like saying there's never evidence of discrimination without explicit pronouncement. There's implied rationale here.