Unpopular opinion, but here it goes: UX is the most important problem we need to solve for Bitcoin Privacy.
We can hate on KYC exchanges all we want, but they've got UX nailed down. We cannot expect privacy to become the norm when I have to take an hour out of my day to make a P2P trade.
Now that CASPs will start delisting privacy assets like Monero and blocking coinjoined btc with the EU's new AMLR, we're being stripped of using regulated exchanges even semi-privately. This makes P2P exchanges like BISQ Network even more important, but its of no use to regular users when you need an introductory course in computer science before understanding what's going on in the app.
Privacy will only become the norm when we make it usable for everybody. **If you're a UX designer, copywriter, or in any other way have expertise in UX design, please consider contributing BISQ:** https://github.com/bisq-network/bisq
ℹ️ If you're not a developer, contributing to GitHub projects can be scary. It really doesn't have to be. I can't tell my asshole from a python script either, and if I can do it, you can too.
Here's how to get started:
If you find a UX issue in the BISQ app that could be improved, start by opening an issue in the BISQ github repository. Give it a clear title describing the problem you want to solve.
Add screenshots or videos to your issue showing what the problem is. If you can, add a proposal for a potential solution. Bonus points if you can add wireframes, layouts or clickdummy documentation. For reference, see npub1zqsu3ys4fragn2a5e3lgv69r4rwwhts2fserll402uzr3qeddxfsffcqrs 's work on eNuts: https://github.com/cashubtc/eNuts/issues/341 (I don't know how to tag people here but you get the idea).
In open source projects, questions are your friends. I've spent countless hours asking every dev i know absolutely insufferable questions, and I still dont know how the fuck to get out of VIM. Everybody starts somewhere, and most people are happy to help.
If you already know how to use git or github and can code a little, ask where you could find the corresponding code for your problem in your issue and offer to do a PR. If you can't, ask what assets would be needed to implement your proposal. Remember that people are nice and generally happy about new contributors, even if you're a beginner.
If you have any questions on contributing to open source projects as a non-coder, feel free to reach out anytime. My DMs are open (I think).
Robosats is reasonably good 👍
The interesting part is that you're wrong and right at the same time!
Adding decimals increases the value of the network as more humans can access it as a unit of account & medium of exchange - meanwhile increasing the accuracy of payments for everyone.
New Bitcoins will be distributed to miners that were never in existence though.
So the net effect will be deflationary - as we can't exceed the ~21M barrier by adding decimals & surely we'd be doing this for people clamoring for it as Satoshis become more valued for goods and services.
Exactly or as close to as you can get it?
1.00000000
=
1.000000000
This is true.
But in our scenario one Satoshi isn't the 8th decimal place anymore.
1.000000001
That is a new Satoshi that didn't exist before and cannot exist unless consensus changes that one day.
So you have to ask yourself how many satoshis make up 1BTC in this scenario?
1BTC = 1BTC
This is true, because to accumulate 1.0....
You need 100M of the current lowest denominator, which if we're adding decimals doesn't change the amount of Satoshis as we describe them today,
That's why LN uses the millisat denomination for everything after 8 decimals so as to not break consensus on how we describe "1 Satoshi".
So if we do add decimal places - we should probably also change the name of the smallest denominator to millisat - which doesn't change anything but can give people a marker of how to count to 1BTC.
"I have 100m Satoshis + 1 millisat"
= 1.000000001
I feel bad that you're taking it the wrong way my g.
But that's why Satoshi added extra halvings into the code.
1btc doesn't exist - only satoshis do.
There is no "breaking a dollar" when you send Bitcoins.
You are sending satoshis.
My buddies in Paris would get jumped by Arabs & Frenchies - pummeled by cowards who would never go 1v1.
They moved & continue to leave.
Good riddance.
Remember when you idiots used to think Jews were screaming antisemitism for no reason.
Now the curtain gets pulled. It's in vogue.
Always has been.
Idk what this has to do with this post? But really bad 🤣
Breaking a dollar into pennies is a bad example,
It's more like breaking a penny into smaller denominations.
2.094 quadrillion sats after the last halving epoch.
If we add more decimals it'll trend to 2.1.
That's minor inflation but we quote 21M BTC already so people shouldn't have an issue with changing the value of 1Sat from .00000001 to .000000001
There are more halvings built in already, all you have to do is change the lowest denominator by adding a decimal place or places and there'll be those block rewards till we get to another situation where we can't split a sat.


