π π π π π π π π π π π π π https://file.nostrmedia.com/p/d49a9023a21dba1b3c8306ca369bf3243d8b44b8f0b6d1196607f7b0990fa8df/c1584248f4163bb26ae0e121ddbe7e22a96248131cfba008d103cae04b8236a6.mp4
I didn't know that was possible.
π― Mint w/ Cinnamon nails it for normies.
Most are more curious about the next season of whatever show. I'd put it closer to 10%.
Alarming but predictable. Wired is not what it once was.

### Fedora vs Debian vs Arch
For all practical purposes, most Linux distros are built on one of three base distributions. Fedora .. Debian .. and Arch.
If you're curious what the differences are, the video below π gives a good breakdown of these 3 base distros used for almost all Linux distributions.
Is it time to switch back to a Fedora based distro? Haven't run that distro in years.
He talks about rolling vs fixed distros. If you aren't familiar with Rolling vs. Fixed distros, π [this post explains it](nostr:nevent1qqsftvjh63669slrssdq782tlcxzpjva2mlppxck9k3s586tgculqacpz3mhxw309ucnydewxqhrqt338g6rsd3e9upzqndled79mkuzf8uu06uvy8spnuy0h7m7ch0d2sytv9zep04c6954qvzqqqqqqycxekr6).
β‘οΈ [Follow](nostr:nprofile1qqsym07t03wahqjfl8r7hrppuqvlpralklk9mm25pzmpgkgtawx3d9gpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhszyrhwden5te0dehhxarj9ekk7mf0qyt8wumn8ghj7mn0wd68yetvd96x2uewdaexwtcs3ewhj) | π£ [Discuss](nostr:nevent1qqsyle9lxzgt5zvd84yhvcdgm7mtthuva2fn076nhzd6qaxd4jyudzqzypxmljmuthdcyj0ecl4ccg0qr8cgl0aha3w764qgkc29jzlt35tf2qcyqqqqq2q4hy6hy)
#Linux #Fedora #Debian #Arch #FreeYourTech
Meh, basically he likes DNF better than the other package managers. OK.
Just found $BITX. Could be a way to add a little spice to the bull run. Then buy more #bitcoin with the profit. NFA
Engagement is good but deceptive polling can lead people to believe there's broad support for otherwise unpopular policies. IMO this is why people distrust polls, and thus the prediction markets struggle to predict the outcome with >X% certainty.
Right, and polling is designed (IMO) to perpetually make the race look close to keep people engaged.
I see your point but obviously we don't live in that ideal scenario.
Yes. Socialism could work if it were voluntary and people weren't mooches.
Back in the 1800's The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) experimented with a voluntary form of it called "The United Order"
In a 1966 speech from one of the old LDS church presidents, he points out the key differences between The United Order and Communism/Socialism.
1. The United Order is 100% voluntary.
2. You can leave the United Order at any time.
3. You only donate your excess to the United Order, instead of everything being taken from you, like in communism.
4. You own private property in the United Order, unlike communism, which seeks to abolish private property (and seeks to abolish other forms of perceived "capital" such as earned standing, status and earned glory)
4. The United Order is under God's laws, not man's laws. (Being voluntary is evidence of this)
Here's the speach:
https://latterdayconservative.com/articles/is-socialism-the-united-order/
Interesting.
Especially disturbing that a single unelected person (Sec Def) has that power, even if it was somehow justified (it never is).
Before AI, nuclear bad. After AI, nuclear good.
No need to default, it's being forgiven now.
Important to remember this. Train yourself to recognize propaganda, especially from mainstream sources.
Sometimes respect is due for choosing the only path likely to lift them out of poverty. That doesn't fully answer your question though.
