I do not. Government regulates mining & exchanges (there's only 1 AFAIK). You might see some coffee & tobacco stores that say "Butcoin," but it's more of an advertising pun. They don't actually transact with Bitcoin.
How come #Amethyst can't find this note?
Zapping working for folks using #Minibits & #Amethyst? It was working a couple weeks ago. Now seems broken. nostr:nprofile1qqstxwlea9ah3u6kjjszu6a7lrnhqkfh8eptp2z6v0e9558tlkkl2rgpzemhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejz7qgwwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkctcpremhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8wetvd3hhyer9wghxuet59u4kl3vp
#asknostrActually, I just checked, and it does not appear it needs sensors either. Try denying that as well. Keep in mind that sandboxing Gboard in this manner will disallow in-keyboard GIFs & voice input. Emojis & swipe will still work.
Gboard is the stock Google keyboard that ships with Pixels. You can find it in Aurora store. When installing, GrapheneOS will ask if you want to grant it network connectivity. Just deny. Alternatively, you can long press the app and open settings. Adjust permissions as follows:
I use Gboard but just deny all permissions (including network connectivity) except sensors. That's the beauty of GrapheneOS. You can deny and sandbox apps to such a granular level. I do the same with Google Photos & Camera. Allow sandboxed Play Services but disable Google Play itself.
Right now I'm in a place that blocks most major VPN providers and Proton services, but leaves Signal, SimpleX, and Tor alone. Makes zero sense! π It's not like they don't know about them; Signal was blocked before.
Tor not blocked, or do you have to use a bridge?
VPN blocking is such a cat-and-mouse game. No one does it better than China, but I feel your pain.
Are you using #Amber? There is a known issue with Unified Push & ntfy. Might be what you're experiencing. nostr:nprofile1qqs827g8dkd07zjvlhh60csytujgd3l9mz7x807xk3fewge7rwlukxgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhszrnhwden5te0dehhxtnvdakz7qgswaehxw309ahx7um5wghx6mmd9usjfpck
Not if you're using Unified Push with ntfy for notifications. There seems to be a bug in #Amber that breaks UP Auth events for both Amethyst & 0xchat. The only way UP works for either is to disable Amber and sign in directly with nsec.
And communication needs to be clearer on this point. Should not be any ambiguity to the user.
Doesn't matter if it's my server or Alibaba. It's not E2EE. Signal and SimpleX enforce E2EE on everything in the chat.
All nostr:nprofile1qqs9ajjs5p904ml92evlkayppdpx2n3zdrq6ejnw2wqphxrzmd62swspz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj72cp92h needs is calling and I'm forcing all my privacy focussed friends to move there π
To everyone jumping on the #0xchat bandwagon, exercise caution and remember it's still under heavy development. As of 5 minutes ago, I confirmed it's still passing unencrypted audio snippets to an Alibaba cloud server even though they were sent in encrypted DMs.
captchas are definitely the solution... #humanity
https://video.nostr.build/834e62860a79c7cc9f38ac7c7e8dccea0540eb92f82557c8e5146159ff3f6847.mp4
A rather depressingly dim outlook there...
Jesus and his Kingdom are our hope.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=1%20Peter%202%3A24-25&version=LSB
https://peakd.com/library/@creatr/the-kingdom-of-jesus-god-the-heavens-my-library-shelf
It is depressing & dim... apart from Jesus π
In most texts there are multiple features that coalesce to communicate the author's point. In translation it is not always possible to clearly convey all of these features (homonyms & rhyme are simple examples); as long as the author's point is well established, not every feature needs to be explained in translation. For example, if I was translating an American diplomat's speech and he used the figurative expression "it's raining cats and dogs," I could not simply translate that word for word into Russian without completely miscommunicating that speaker's intent. I would have to simplify the thought, substitute a different figure of speech, or embark on an extended explanation of what the expression means to English speakers. In the case of John 3, if you feel some critical point of the author will be missed without handling the homonym, a parenthetical comment or footnote would probably be the least disruptive approach.
