I'm not sure you really get Saylor take on Bitcoin and Lightning Network.
Please share articles or videos where he says the things you said.
Any takes into the GPU sharing economy? I'm looking into it. Money and simulations, Asics and GPUs. Does it make sense for the individual to have both, it make it extremely decentralized but is it efficient?
PS: want to upgrade my 2060 to a 4070, does it make sense if the target is use it for something like Gputopia?
I recently red "Free private city", it gives a big ints regarding pros and cons of immigration.
I'm almost pro but big cultural differencies can bring big problems. If we do know how to live with other people and respect them, integration can be really hard, almost impossible
Gm from đȘđș Europe where we killed our hated despotic kings so that our loved elected republicans could enjoy this lavish lifestyle.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1704548839514898432/vid/avc1/640x360/kwy7jSZZhqdn7oyi.mp4
It make me sick to think that we are all paying for that luxury bs, even if I would never give them a single sat
Got on a sidetrack this morning and found this interesting little paper from 2004: "why proof of work doesn't work".
https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~rnc1/proofwork.pdf
(from a quick read of the conclusion, their argument doesn't appear that strong, but the basic idea is well known - attackers are prepared to spend a ton more to specialize, than ordinary users are, etc. etc.)
This paper might seem quaint to Bitcoiners who are convinced that PoW *does* work, but bear in mind: they are thinking of the spam problem specifically, and so their analysis could still be very relevant today, e.g. in the case of using PoW for systems like Tor or Lightning.
Interesting tidbit, the first author Ben Laurie is the guy, iirc, that invented "Lucre" an ecash system that is an early precursor of privacypass and cashu.
Yeah I would say poor argument too. The purpose of proof-of-work is to create a fair market for the partecipants. Technology will never discriminate the "good" and the "bad" guy.
Spam is spam when the cost to share is zero, if it is not zero, it's just advertising. If it's good advertising it will last because of profitability, if it is not it will go because it is too costly to maintain.
"It seems that the tides are turning though. The flash is wearing off, day by day more and more people are becoming aware of the lies they've been fed by this class of people, and they are reacting in the only way they know how; by attempting to quash the disobedience with censorship. They don't want the information that proves they are incompetent to spread so they are preparing to stop it by any means necessary"
50/50 is a big chunck, morally speaking I would go with a 10%. Give a lesson for the error but also show integrity.
The protocol do not forgive, people do
nostr:note1gq6gf92eh04mgvxlx2slxp9hfheadx5nrrjzjp7pkunx5r2umgwqadpds2Some kind of personalized filter that can give scores to profiles, transparent and open source. That can be activated or switched. There we will see the real difference between Nostr and any other kind of Social app I think
I mean, you are not completely wrong
Amazing cinematic and storytelling, check it out
www.youtube.com/watch?v=o48X3_XQ9to
Trying to do that too, boosting local economy, not weird at all
I stick with the Natural Chocolate flavour
I can't stand those comments no more. I almost feel sick reading how opinions people have no idea about are still shared with such ease and almost arrogance.
So happy to not be able to log into Shitter because I was suspended.
I'll share again and again until someone explain me that I'm wrong but:
I'd love to have priority messages on Nostr profiles so developers and other npub with big a following can be reached if someone tips certain amounts of sats.
A bigger tip would mean, theorically, a more valuable information that someone want to share.
This could create more signal in the messages sent because information and satoshis are used together.
The profile could for example, ensure response times of 6 hours with message with a zap of 5000 sats (high priority), 24 hours with a zap of 1000 sats (mid priority) and no sats or low sats for other response times (low priority).
I personally think that at the moment we have too much noise in the comments and probably in the DMs. Sorry not sorry but as in the bitcoin ledger, relays space and people attention is limited too. Having a sea of interactions (or notes and other stuff) in not good for the overall success of a network like this one.
Watching the Crossfit Games. Way too commercial for me but seeing such athlets working so hard is so humbling and motivating i wanna go workout in my box again today đ
That's a very well put thought, when things get complicated, we need to find a compromize to simplify them.
We are good at it and we evolved well but human is too fallace and we are always looking for the easy way.
I think that, open-source AI could help us be more objective, being able to better understand what the single person is looking for and where the right terms can be found in todays humanly impossible to read/understand TOS.
Seems fake, there are other asset that can be considered commodities because not issued by anyone. And the SEC knows it.
When you do that, you move bitcoins from someone that is selling them because they don't want them, to someone that want and is accepting them.
Feel like the best way to increase adoption to me
Friction is the perfect word here.
I think too that everything that can be done or shared should be "payed" at least for the amount that is needed for the transaction to be made or to be stored.
The problem is that transaction and storing cost are almost 0 so even if you made the procedure hard, as soon as you decrypt it, then sharing is really easy.
You need the Relays to have to ask for cost of rebroadcasting, but as soon as a price is put, it will create a market, and in a market the cost will always fall into the maintenance price, that will also fall when the technology advance.
Had to translate but:
If you think deeply enough "copyright" it's just a tool to enrich someone that had the luck or power to seem the author of something
How many cases we can find where the real author was not the one with the copyrights? How can you be sure that, that person was the first one to create that things?
Its very deep and hard to draw a line about it, it seems morally correct to give a prize to author but the reality I think is different. It is better to incentivize people to find information and not to pay them when it is found.
In a world full of creators and arts who will really look for authentic pieces?
Yep, as soon AI gets 10x better and cheaper, no human creator will be able to provide more value than an AI via internet
Sad but true, human skills are only real social interactions
If you take out coercion and theft, value 4 value it's what moves the world.
The only thing I would add is that, we cannot pretend to get something when we give out information. When information are shared it's already too late to get something back for it. The only thing you can look into are donations from people that value your work and want more from you.
If you think, when you are paying for a subscription plan you are paying to support the future work of an artist, you are not paying for the work he already have done. Morally and phisically it does not make sense to pay to get informations that have already been created and shared. But it does make sense to give money (time and energy) to someone that can give you back value in a way you cannot give it to yourself.
Exactly, you pay for hope in future work from the creator, not in the work (or i prefer information) already done