yesh and Bitcoin also had inflation bugs. and unlike Monero it was actually exploited.
Moneros was detected, patched and provably not exploited.
and if you want to talk about "consensus failure," Bitcoin also has several "consensus failures" (chain fork) ie, Bitcoin Cash. exactly the same thing that happened with Monero Original.
so maybe this is just normal software development.
and yes, if the math says so, it is auditable. thats what math is.
Stonewall is a good thing to do by default and more wallets should implement it.
I'm working to improve my coin control and privacy practices. My bitcoins currently sit on a Blockstream Jade and come from various traceable sources (exchanges, P2P, Alby, etc.).
Goal:
Effective privacy without overcomplicating my security model. I want to obfuscate these transaction histories.
My understanding so far:
Need to transfer from Jade to a hot wallet for coinjoining
Sparrow offers "fake coinjoins" (Stonewall transactions) that work solo
Real coinjoins require coordination but offer stronger privacy
Specific questions:
Workflow confirmation: Is Jade → hot wallet → coinjoin → new cold storage the right approach?
Tool choice: Sparrow vs Wasabi for someone prioritizing hardware wallet integration?
Stonewall vs collaborative coinjoins: When is fake coinjoin sufficient vs needing the real thing?
Common mistakes: What privacy-killing errors should I avoid?
UTXO management: Best practices for managing mixed vs unmixed coins?
I've read Sparrow's docs on private spending but would love real-world insights from those who've implemented robust privacy practices.
What's worked best for your setup?
https://stacker.news/items/1015766/r/PictureRoom
#asknostr
the real question is what are you protecting against.
what do you think about the possibility of a 6102?
but if you're resigned to having a KYC trail, your flow sounds correct. I don't think Stonewall is a substitute for a real CJ.
also new Whirlpool coordinator dropped the other day.
what...? i had no idea 🤣
emphasis on censorship resistance means finance bros will never pump it
what security risks?
what chain splits?
what network fragmentation?
what consensus failure?
what large attack surface?
what wallet "incomparability?"
what "misconfigurations?"
what bugs?
how is 10% of bitcoin daily volume "low adoption?"
did you know it is auditable achually?
but yeah, the tx size is bigger than bitcoin and that might limit scalability (not unique to Monero, blockchains don't scale).
Would love some examples of these supposed problems, otherwise you're 100% 🤣
regulatory capture of the network is well underway
#bitcoin maxis in shambles
if I sent you the dimensions could you make me a wallet for Goldbacks?
hard forks arent "patches," they are network upgrades. software has to upgrade as the environment it operates in changes. monero updates in a clear direction and in an organized way, with community support.
also, bitcoins privacy hasn't upgraded at all. you're pretending there's improvement happening where there isn't.
it's true there are risks involved, but there are ALSO risks involved in doing nothing.
Fun fact
The only rationale for a hard cap is that early adopters want increased purchasing power without proof of work.
a homie pointed out to me that if the intention was to destroy the *narrative for war*,
hitting those sites and being done was a pretty cagey move.
lets see the hawks rationalize a prolonged conflict with Trump going on and on about how he destroyed Irans ability to produce a nuke.
the man's a grifter but appears to NOT be another psychopath. its really refreshing.
Catalpa
#flowerstr

how big is that flow hood?
All sizes in feet? or meters?
its that "ability to find stuff" thats the deal breaker.
if you just want street data, +1 for Organic maps.
but you cant beat google for lists of places.
appreciate you ❤️
i give Matt shit because i like him, hes an influencer in the space and discussion needs to be kept squarely over cypherpunk shit for maximum freedom potential.
not saying its effective, its just what I do 🤷
I cant figure out whats wrong now
got everything working again but my Deltachat
its always DNS.... somehow...
maybe rub some avocado oil on and heat on low/med flame for 10 minutes
then wipe with off the oil after it cools
seals it up good
hmm
looked like some certificate problems on my mail server fucked up my Deltachat....
it was either cooperation among nations or empire
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
this isnt "doing my research and sharing things"
so far what we got from you is a premature "they didn't fix it... oh wait... maybe they did, lemme look"
but interested to see if you turn up something actually substantial.
yeah but he didn't accurately describe the result.
there just hasn't been enough time to review and theres lots of nuance.
Robosats neither has a similar threat model, trade volume or architecture to a DNM
kids
its not "DNM" unless it has a similar thread model as Silk Road and its successors.
different threat model, different market type.
STN wants to do whatever he can to make LN look well battle tested.
it isn't.
durrr
its a DNM if it has an .onion
durrr
cant make an omelette....
Your weekly reminder that nostr:nprofile1qqsrf5h4ya83jk8u6t9jgc76h6kalz3plp9vusjpm2ygqgalqhxgp9gpzfmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82cspp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqpzpmhxue69uhkummnw3ezumrpdejqd2970s is God tier software.
is there any other wallet that runs the node and lets you do the payment routing on the device?
that seems to be the minimum viable product for a privacy preserving LN wallet.
dnms dont really seem to change lol
ummm.... lol
you dont count.
in this context i mean the cultists.
Tbh i don't think you're really wrong. an equilibrium will be reached and there will still be investment.
but in setting up a permanently deflationary condition, we are actively discouraging it.
the more economic growth that exists, the greater the incentive for each individual to not invest.
in addition to my concerns about setting the barrier to entry too high, its just a bad incentive structure to have everyone profit at the expense of those who actually generate economic activity.



