Replying to Avatar nout

I'm interested in more details from nostr:nprofile1qqstnem9g6aqv3tw6vqaneftcj06frns56lj9q470gdww228vysz8hqpzdmhxue69uhkzmr8duh82arcduhx7mn9qy2hwumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgqgdwaehxw309ahx7uewd3hkcam28zl .

As an engineer I get triggered when someone uses the word "all" (or "impossible").

If they use "all" and then there are negative examples, then the person is wrong, lying, manipulating, or just being dumbass.

Use that type of speak when you talk to government or lawyers, not to other nostriches.

It’s taking hours to out the entire list together and find all of the sources, but it’s genuinely hard to believe when you put the entire list in one place. The problem is tht even though these are all the actual manufacturers and the FDA as the source, it can’t just be google searched and post the link that comes up like 99% of people who “debate” the topic. You can’t even use Ai to help thanks to how horribly censored it is.

And yes, very unfortunately, the word “all” is actually accurate for everything on the child CDC vaccine schedule. And I’ll have the details on every one of it doesn’t take me the whole week.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I’ve worked for a couple hours over yesterday and Saturday and have most of the list, but some of the sources have been removed from pubmed, but luckily I already saved some it seems and I’m finding the others on clinicaltrials.gov

Looking forward to review the list. I expect you apply "The SCiEnCe" standards you initially cited 😉

Take your time, generations of researchers worked on the issues you are trying to address here.

Sci Hub or Anna's archive is your friend for inaccessible "doi"s.

Thanks, I’ll add that to my toolbox 🙏🏻

Yeah, that's a massive one! It goes around the paywalls for medical papers.

Also if you want to get any (ANY!) book for e-readers, then Anna's is the place.