Timing attacks:
are trivial *on LN* with over 90% of the network being custodial. And also mitm attacks extremely possible.
Timing attacks are a possibility everywhere and depends on the surveillance conditions. It's a lie to say that on LN you don't have to worry about it.
Merge analysis :
Sure this can be a thing when you have a blockchain. As you're aware, fcmp fixes this.
But it's a complete lie to suggest that it's possible to establish what txos belong to who. This is a heuristic which *could* suggest probabilistic correlation.
Recency bias:
I'm assuming you mean the decoy selection algorithms. again a *possible heuristic*. one that absolutely nobody could establish the weight of. Again fcmp fixes this.
Talking about unencrypted senders and recipients is just completely disingenuous.
Here's fluffys scorching ridicule on X
https://xcancel.com/fluffypony/status/1824433941459157115
Amounts only partially encrypted is just a straight up lie. I think you mean to say that "the fee is visible by design"
Transactions permanent and public:
Blockchain 👍
Its is a lie to suggest that it is public, since addresses, recipients and amounts cannot be read by third parties.
Equally disingenuous to claim that senders know who the receiver is.
The address the sender uses never appears on chain and the stealth address will never appear again.
