Too many cypherpunks don't know their cypherpunk history, gm

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

GM 🫂☕

What phrase are we referring to

four horsemen of the infopocalypse

wow. I thought you were referring to the 'cypherpunk' name and was about to rant about Gilmore's(?) gf who actually came up with that name.

The first thing a cypherpunk must have is morals, neither you nor your boyfriend have them.

Privacy, according to you, is only for those you choose. What kind of privacy is that? Everyone knows they can't talk to you privately because you'll leak their messages.

You're definitely a total “bitchpunk”.

nostr:nevent1qqspgaqc7xvhzalex8xzsjgjt9y9tyuhv6a0x0qdfujkknfwmd8qpxgnpuqfd

GM.

❌ cypherpunks

✅ cyberbitches

We want bitcoin as money, you useful idiots.

I want bitcoin as money too, lets talk about it

i’m creating friendship as a currency

Those are called favors. I'm also working on that lol

what if we score our friends?

Sure, you probably already do so without writing it down. A favor from friend 1 is more valuable than a favor from friend 2 because friend 1 is more reliable or whatever other reason may be.

we can rate our givings ( not just in bills )

caring for our community and helping each other evolve and become better friends.

in what are you working on?

Hehehe. Sorry. I've found not talking about a project makes me more likely to actually do it.

But, what if we could easily ask our friends for a favor from one of their friends?

Money is for strangers

Favors are for friends

bitcoin is love as currency

Bitcoin as money is a pipe dream. Five minutes of research would reveal that "fungibility" is an essential prerequisite for money.

Gold is fungible.

Cash is fungible by decree.

Monero is fungible through encryption.

Bitcoin is transparent which means through attached outside metadata it becomes social credit.

Fiat bank accounts and CBDC are both (social) credit systems.

Some genius can use Bitcoin in a fungible way that doesn't make the whole system fungible.

Journalists wanting something, ignoring hard facts when pointed out are activists. We have too much of those wannabe journalists running around.

Stick to the facts. Point out observations and investigative research. For wanting a better world I don't need journalists.

I actually agree with a lot of what you said

What now

Define who you are. I see more value in your work as an impartial journaliat over an activist.

But you are the one to decide and I am the one to judge the value of your contribution for me.

I wouldn't care if you decide on a case by case basis if you act as a journalist and apply certain standards while at other times you really feel passionate for one thing over another as an activist.

But I'd like to see the self-reflection. Because without it it will just muddy waters and neither serve your role as journalist nor as activist.

Pass

The algos don't promote cypherpunk philosophy.

Sir there are no algorithms here

Yeah, but there are also not many people here. 😉

I would like to retract my accidental “like” on this comment. I take a neutral stance.

Don't make me tap the sign.

It’s always worth the time to tap the sign brother

…and Epstein list apologists and silent on the cause of the largest child amputee population in history.

So are you retracting your fake hit piece article or not?

No offense but I don‘t think your team qualifies to determine whats fake news or not lol

Ad-hominem, appeal to anti-authority.

Udi (of taproot wizards) refuted and debunked your ridiculous hit piece.

He’s correct, the claims in the article are so cheap and illogical that calling it a psyop gives it too much credit.

Good luck gaining any credibility back with this Pseudonym, you’ll need it 🤣

nostr:nevent1qqsvsq709m00dddy60mfrla68fc5p7skk3u9uznw7xfygz3dlr8j5uszyr70wzj9e75p064gzwum4z3ht4cn6vtf7j3870w2c02fzyklvlfhuqcyqqqqqqgtakyve

Beepboop

Who‘s there

A retard who thinks that Udi is right

Wake me up when you know how to actually debate me, loser

nostr:note1stjp0608nngjm4zfga0uwxexr7hjwgpsf3x6jw98retgfrev2wqsh08lhm

You can’t hard fork Bitcoin without massive publicity and huge popular support for the new altcoin.

Let’s see if the video format is simple enough for you to understand:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=CP-04bSqka0

See this is how you guys disqualify yourselves from every serious conversation lmao

The serious conversation is that I am wasting my time talking to you sadly.

Christ wins in the end. 🧡

All the best to you too amigo

I thought you were serious, unfollowing bye bye.

That would require too much integrity

GM & PV

Restricting “datacarriersize” isn’t “think of the children” any more than demanding the release of Epstein Files to uncover Israeli/US blackmail operations.

Blowing out OP_RETURN is bad-jacking node operators so that gov’ts can selectively target and control for agency capture.

compliance is defiance 🤘

Case in point, history Coretards ignore:

Im really sorry to apparently be the one to break this to you

So you'd rather have CSAM, than prayers. Noted.

Is this supposed to be a gotcha moment? The coinbase field is reserved for few bytes of data to create extra entropy, so it’s up to the miner that _successfully_ mined a block to decide what to put in this field. It’s the exact same thing Satoshi did when he put the Chancellor headline in the genesis block. Or do you claim Satoshi was abusing Bitcoin, then contradicting himself?