Like Primal does with shotgun KYC to zap
Before talk about others look inside and see what you are doing against it..
Discussion
What’s shotgun kyc?
that is not shotgun kyc
shotgun kyc is when the info is asked after you deposit, holding funds hostage
the wallet is optional, you can send and receive zaps on primal without it
you can also use any other nostr app by simply copy and pasting your nsec
gotem
I dont buy that Odell
There are ways to build clients without KYC also so why a "Freedom figther" prefered to build it with KYC whem he can do it without it? I know the answer ($$$)
Now you will tell me, because normies will be easily onboard
You cant criticize others and then do the exact thing they are doing.
There is no good KYC and bad KYC, its all bad!
And if you do any form of KYC you are complaining
well pretty sure i coined the term shotgun kyc and the nuance matters, its strictly better to be upfront about it then lock users in and force it on them
doesnt seem possible to ship a self custody wallet that accepts small zaps but we may move to spark or something like that when the tech matures, its a priority but dont want to rush it and have users lose funds
While I run LND over tor and use AlbyHub for zaps, I appreciate that custodial zaps exist while we work towards better solutions. I'm still unable to receive zaps because that requires LNURL and doesn't work with onion services, but I think we can eventually work this out and have fully anonymous, self custodial zaps
i will also be waiting for that solution, but i'm afraid it will never come. at least not in any 9 eyes countries
It's just code - NWC could have a safe way to generate a public connection string that can only make invoices, and clients could use this instead of an LNURL address
But clients can already implement NWC, no?
Yes, but there isn't a nice way to generate NWC connections that are safe, so no one is putting them in their nostr profiles, therefore no clients implement it. I admit that I should push harder for this, but I'm fixated on something bigger right now
Now im seeing why you "coined" the term, usefull to have good KYC and bad KYC now..
Clients should not even try to be wallets, thats one more point of failure, much easier to build the connection bridges and let wallets do their job
I understand money must come from somewhere, but with that you are selling data like big tech does, to get funding with the KYC that users that dont do what you said and comply, give to you, interesting..
If you believe your product is really the best, why use short cuts and say yes for VC money?
Long term preference remeber?
What if your Client or customer is bad guy .. then what ? Whose fault is that ? The vendor who refused KYC policy or the customer ?
shotgun kyc is when the info is asked after you deposit, holding funds hostage
the wallet is optional, you can send and receive zaps on primal without it
you can also use any other nostr app by simply copy and pastin
Trying to defend primal when primal are doing something that's inherently bad..
Expected better from you nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnswf5k6ctv9ehx2aqnz0fd0
Primal is trying to be the legacy social media of nostr.
Primal is seriously everything that's wrong with twitter Facebook etc.