most bitcoin podcasters will change their product recommendations for a $20k sponsorship and a ref link

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Haha — should I edit my note then? 😂

its directionally correct

bitcoin provides people the financial freedom not to sell out, but many still do

Would you change the format of RHR to this from time to time just for shits and giggles? 🥩

Marty has to dress as Big Steve and shave his head or wear a bald cap. This is going to be entertainment, C Funk!

Gotta give the people what they want nostr:npub1guh5grefa7vkay4ps6udxg8lrqxg2kgr3qh9n4gduxut64nfxq0q9y6hjy Conflict resolution through conflict

I am very concerned with Nat’s latest interviews. Following Pomp’s path.

Losing the plot of "coin stories" unfortunately

Even more pervasive when said Bitcoin podcasters are perceived as having strong moral and values. Don’t trust verify, always.

And just obey the algorithm

#40hpw

Simply Bitcoin is painful with their constant "bitcoin is about to EXPLODE“ clickbait titles and their sponsor ads as if they are part of the show. It's a shame Dante Cook ended up there he should start his own show/business.

No ads, no sponsors, no clickbait and I only interview people whose work I feel a deep connection with when it happens (unpodcast):

https://www.youtube.com/@Daniellaio

Some still recommend ledger

ledger pays the most

That is what I meant. Sold to ads, because as a bitcoiner that is the last thing you recommend in this day and age.

Which bitcoin podcasts are promoting Ledger?

I do none of that with my podcast.

If I use it, I recommend it some of the time, with a few exceptions. Why would I even want a sponsor if I know I'll be toasted over?