is palmer luckey here?
sharing this bc i consider is an important conversation we need to have
can someone take the lead?


























is palmer luckey here?
sharing this bc i consider is an important conversation we need to have
can someone take the lead?


























The internet is a subsystem within nation states. Nation states will always have jurisdiction. This concept is dumb.
NO, it is not
Who enforces laws? Who resolves disputes? Without a clear authority, youโd risk power vacuums, where unaccountable entities (corporations, rogue groups, or even the proposed AI agency itself) could dominate over others. Relying on nation-state authorities over digital networks solves all these issues.
And you can physically leave the one you don't like.
NO, it has to be beyond Nation-States
Its not a good idea. There's no accountability beyond nation states and incentives can't be properly aligned outside of monetary/economic systems like Bitcoin.
So, unless your going to use another alt-coin what you want to do will go off the rails very quickly.
ALL IN BITCOIN
i see CIA as an intโl system to secure / protect our rights ( worldwide )
to enforce law ( like interpol but effective )
I had a similar idea, but it would have no authority except as an arbitrator between voluntary parties. Still, there's a lot you can do with that, and it's power scales with adoption.
But also he's right about replacing the judicial system, that really shouldn't be the focus. You need to do what you can with what you have. Make it useful even at the smallest scale.
Yes, it is the focus
we need a new judicial system
BITCOIN IS TRUTH
this image was generated long time ago
now the AI tools became much better

letโs change the system
Yes