What’s your opinion on this?

For me, I believe anyone who creates Ai porn of real people deserve jail time, i’m sorry. Porn has rotted peoples brains.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

It's extreme sexual harrassment, but so far you can only get them on copyright laws and stuff.

As far as I know, it's completely legal to create it, but not to share it with anyone else.

i get why that’s legal but god some people are just disgusting. why even do it in the first place

No idea.

Hell is not a physical place - it’s a state which we can enter

I’m not sure how you would enforce laws around this kind of thing, and deepfakes are not a new phenomenon, but rest assured that people who engage in activities which are bad for the soul will get what they deserve

Researching who owns and promotes major porn companies is a great rabbit hole btw

oh 100%, and yes i’ve done that, that changed my whole views. never been a fan of porn but that’s just my personal mindset.

well i'm sure there are already laws on the books about using someone's likeness without their permission. so, she'll likely win her case.

as far as porn in general, i have no issues with adults doing adult things.

yea, in this case there’s no consent, and i just feel as if porn in general is the root cause of this issue in the first place.

I love it. I love Taylor Swift too. But I hope AI💎 will grow in quality and sophistication. We are just scratching the surface of what AI💎 can do for humanity.

It will be beyond your wildest imagination and fantasy. Bring it on baby. If we're not moving ahead, we're losing ground..AI💎AGI💎🫂😊❤️

so your opinion is that creating porn with real people without their consent with ai is okay? i’m not understanding

Basically, yes..❤️🫂😊

Eww.

You better not have.

https://youtu.be/HEXWRTEbj1I?si=Tq2yWMFzo9lHsM0P -What Is Love..🫂😊❤️

You're just trolling.

You're a weird, sad, disgusting little man.

Fascinating..🤔

With the actors and writers strike in Hollywood, they won guarantees to require permission and compensation before anyone had any right to use their likeness with AI.

It’s the only way to keep this someone within reasonable control.

So yeah, Taylor should definitely sue

Thinking about the women who don’t have access to legal teams and the money to fight in court who are dealing with same situation. it’s an awful thing to do to someone.

Absolutely horrible. Courts and legal system is great in the U.S. (relatively speaking), but too often only when you have the time and resources

That right was negotiated from Hollywood studios. It wasn’t written into a law.

It can't be stopped. So it is a fool's errand to pass laws about it. Better to spend time making algos that prevent it from being shown in your or your child's feed.

It is almost a cultural issue and we have to create new morals to teach our kids how to use the internet. Can't legislate morality.

You’re absolutely right unfortunately… Kids shouldn’t use the internet at all imo. One of my harshest beliefs but I wish i never had access to the internet until i was 18.

Rules in my home:

No using mommy's or daddy's phone without direct supervision and only for talking to your grandparents (we live 20 hours away from both sides).

No phone until you can pay your own bill.

Social Media will be banned until at least 18.

No internet without direct supervision.

You can only play video games with daddy.

No smartwatches because fuck those things.

Introduce them to MeWe instead of Meta when the time comes.

I in principle disagree, but children should only be allowed in heavily "sanitized" corners of the internet, though in reality, children are both curious and inventive and tend to find cracks in the walls.

"Can't legislate morality."

Incorrect. Morality is the only thing that is ever legislated. It is simply a matter of whose idea of morality, and to what extent morality should be legislated. VERY little morality should be legislated, but there is no escaping that whatever IS legislated is someone's view of what is morally right or wrong.

Saying what I'm feeling 👍

Adult films sells so keep it, p.s. prostitution is the oldest profession in the world

this is a non consensual act. therefore not making it an “adult film”

Unfortunately, men probably would rather see videos of the sort of woman who would never willingly make a video.

There are adult film women on nostr

Those aren't the women men are making the deepfake stuff of. That would be beside the point.

Lol how do u know it's just men doing the deepfakes, how do you know it isn't women as well like wtf

Because it's the sort of creepy rapey stuff men do.

Wow so lesbians wouldn't do that?!?!

Stop deflecting. Nobody cares about lesbians.

Lol u make seem like butch lesbians wouldn't use deep fake technology to make adults films about celebrities lmao

Lesbians are not just men with vaginas. Just figured I would put this out there.

The hard-core window-licking going on in this thread is astounding.

True. If you look at the lesbian divorce rate, even lesbians don't care about lesbians!

Well any prohibition law, is useless and could just do worst .. They invented the fake news to grow up propaganda, now they invented deep fake to force people to not believe in what they saw .. So let's use our brain to choose good from devil, we don't need something else that tell us what is right what is not. They are smiling because cause of those request from people asking for punishment and prison, they are going to introduce more restrictive and freedom killer laws. Stupid things and stupid people ever has been and ever will be ... It's the same, yesterday people played with Photoshop today they play with AI ... Should we prohibit Photoshop or AI ? I would say no ... People should develop self criticism , not asking police ,governments and other shit to imprison themselves ... It will be very worst when governments will force their models and their AI and their deep fake ...

God clothes Adam and Eve in glory - despite lack of physical clothes. Satan strips and exposes "nakedness" - despite presence of physical clothes. Seems demonic.

"And he had power to give life unto the image of the beast, that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed." Sounds like AI to me.

Is the problem that the AI images are good enough to make some people believe Taylor Swift posed for them? I don’t think she could sue if someone created a painting or a sculpture of her.

Deepfakes are very convincing. Just need one picture and a video to paste it into.

A la Cárcel por delincuentes 😡

She's a prop used to push agendas

Hard to say. Cut his balls off maybe?

Fuck me, a direct existential paradox to your mom

nostr:npub1jvp6kfs2d3m98lyw5wcyr4fnctr83s0rc3mj5p0f75ach6vcd8rst6wqnu

🤦

Imo it depends on the intent (mens rea) of the author; jailtime depends on what damage can be proven in a court of law.

If it is made with intent to cause reputational damage in the eye of the public, then there is (or should be) chances of significant recuperation. I'm unsure about how many gases in the US have resulted in jailtime for defamation, as this is usually settled in Civil suits.

Yeah, usually ends up in civil court.

Easiest is probably to sue the image hosting service.

As an enjoyer of pornographic content, including that made by AI (of people who do not exist), I have to say that the idea of someone making such content featuring a woman without her permission is disgusting. I am very grateful that there are women out there willing to share their glorious bodies VOLUNTARILY, but to effectively expose someone to the world without their permission is as bad as the asshole boyfriends out there who post their ex-girlfriends' nudes that were intended for their eyes only, back when they were together.

I am just not sure if there is any effective legal grounds or means to punish it, and I don't know that we would want to open that Pandora's box of increased state power, either. The answer to people doing shitty things to us shouldn't be to run to daddy government. Not sure what it should be, but taking it to the state to "fix" for us just makes matters worse for everyone in the end.

The issue is that the AI porn is essentially code and code is protected under free speech

Correct. The code itself is, what you do with it isn't necessarily. Similar to firearms being protected by the second amendment, but shooting someone without just cause is not.

But again, we shouldn't run crying to daddy government to fix the problem for us when people are being assholes on the internet. They already have far too much power, and I would not want to hand them any more, even though I think violating someone by making a porn of them against their wishes is disgusting.

I agree keep the feds out of it, but if people can't police ourselves and not do fucked up shit then people will eventually feel no choice but to file suit and seek the opinion of the courts

It's that mentality of, "I can't do something about this myself, so I am going to get someone else to do it for me," that I find to be absolutely antithetical to a free society. Once we accept that there are some people more qualified to deal with our problems than ourselves, it is inevitable that we continue imbuing them with more and more power.

Outside of actions that cause physical harm to another person, or else destruction or theft of another individual's property, the State should not be involved in settling the matter whatsoever.

Preach

She's fighting a losing battle.

https://vipergirls.to/threads/9256543-Taylor-Swift-fakes

For science...

Creating porn of fake people can get one jailed here 🇨🇦 Obviously, we will make it illegal to do this to real people.