I don’t understand people who advocate for sun bathing without sunblock but then freak out about Bluetooth and WiFi radiation.
You do know you’re getting much higher risk exposure in the sun? UV energy levels higher than Bluetooth or WiFi AND has ionizing potential…
Never heard anyone say that
Like half the Bitcoiners here … literally.
Its true, most sunscreen products are poisonous shitcoins
We’re talking about uv exposure
Yeah, i think the responder was alluding to the fact that sunblock has carcinogenics, which gives people cancer when the sunscreen has a chemical reaction to the sun. If this was not a concern, wouldn’t most sun bathers just use sunscreen?
I wasn’t arguing whether it was or not. I’m comparing the incoherent logic of sun fine but low power nonionizing radiation bad. You could say both are bad that’s fine … but you can’t say one is fine and the other isn’t - that’s contradicting own logic.
Makes sense, I suppose the responder replaced “sun bathing” with “sun exposure.”
Perhaps the most succinct way would be to say, “those that sun bath but are fearful of EMFs don’t realize the irony.”
Freaking out over Bluetooth means going back to using wired headphones, so I don’t get it either 🤣
Haha reasoning with this kind of people is useless
Modedration is key, may it be with the sun or any other emmiting source. I found that most if not all ionization studies don't take in effect accumulated effects total of all the sources a person comes in to contact with daily..
Let's just say after doing a thorough scan of all my power sockets and especially all extension chords. I made an effort last year to clean up the house from E-smog. Finding cheap crap emmiting more then 10x the save standard.
And although it's just anecdotal. The 'vibe' in my home has improved greatly!
How did you determine if something was “cheap”
Because I bought cheap extension chords from Action store without the little plastic covers that can be annoying when they're made of crappy plastic.
I now have extension chords that emit zero even at a 1cm distance. Funny thing is the microwave I bought secondhand for 10€ has perfect deadzones..
What did you scan with?
The only thing I might be concerned about is close proximity to emitters, but you'd have to be standing right in front of one on a tower for it to be dangerous I think (in terms of cell signals). Bluetooth and WiFi are pretty weak unless there's something I don't know.
Strong connection between the uptake of sunscreen and incidents of skin cancer compared to countries where sunscreen isn't widely used.
And non-ionizing radiation effects are very much determined by frequency. Lower frequency EM radiation has a much deeper penetration ability. For example, Wifi penetrates walls but a flashlight does not.
But you have me muted while I neither advocate for unnecessary exposure to the sun nor the other things
Read my article on nostr about the benefits of sunlight? It explains some of this. You can find it in my reads.
It’s also my understanding that the issues of EMF isn’t about UV
Two completely different frequences. One is natural, the other is possible a weapon, man made
The problem is you are only trying to look at the picture from energy perspective.
Yes, Man made RF radiation doesn’t have enough energy to cause thermal damage/break DNA bonds directly but that is not the only way these non native, non-ionising radiation can cause harm.
The truth is that EMF research has evolved tremendously the last 30 years. The old idea that man made radiation (AC electric, AC magnetic, RF, Dirty electricity) is only harmful if it heats you is no longer scientifically valid. There are now hundreds of quality studies that show biological effects at exposures similar to consumer technology.
It’s not about the frequency, energy or power levels alone.
Our body is designed to work in perfect balance with the Solar EMF, the 250 -3000nm broadband spectrum of the sunlight.
