YouTube/google is shadow banning the fuck out of the Rogan/Trump interview.
Outright censorship from a supposedly “neutral” platform.
So here’s the link 🔗 https://youtu.be/hBMoPUAeLnY?si=d15WNZNqx4Bp4_9p
Enjoy!
YouTube/google is shadow banning the fuck out of the Rogan/Trump interview.
Outright censorship from a supposedly “neutral” platform.
So here’s the link 🔗 https://youtu.be/hBMoPUAeLnY?si=d15WNZNqx4Bp4_9p
Enjoy!
Saved this for later. Curious about this interview
I went scorched earth on Google products this summer after the Dr Robert Epstein Pod with Rogan.
☕️🧡👊🏻
Just imagine how many views it would have if YT was promoting it as they would ANY OTHER video that had gotten 33 million views in 2 days...
It will not show up searching "joe rogan trump". YouTube is pathetic.
Orange man ran a masterclass this episode
Never been more impressed with this man and in fact just came back from dropping off my early ballot (Michigan)
🇺🇸
What exactly did you find impressive and masterclass about his performance?
He has a great understanding of the macro outlook of our global economy. He just talks hyperbolically by reflex that alot of people dismiss this aspect of his knowledge
Plus if every Trump soundbite for your brain becomes MSM sourced, your bias inherently becomes out of whack. This longform interview proved natsayers wrong that Trump is clueless
Seemed to me that it sealed the deal for this election as the only remaining naysays can be TDS victims who wouldnt vote Trump for any scenario that could exist.
Thanks for the take!
Good luck friend
Also for what its worth, my wife and I are 1st time Trump voters this election
Therefore I personally know how strong TDS can be. It will be studied for decades
Thanks, you too! I'm not American so I can't vote. I just find it fascinating to watch the psychology behind it all and understand your positions.
I don't envy you guys for having to choose between what I see as two rather disappointing options. I did like Vivek or Kennedy so much more. Don't know what has to happen to get people like those in the right positions.
Vivek looks appealing just because he's brown. Kennedy is part of a family dynasty. Trump is the only representative of the white people that working hard make money and build infrastructure for others. Trump is the only that created jobs for a huge amount of people. We want that, not politicians.
Your entire post reads like you're racist. Did I misinterpret that?
I don't care about Vivek's skin color either way.
The entire system is racist. All are racist. They use racism to push unvotable people just because they are a specific skin color. You really think it's about something different when you see dark people in key political position in England for example. Or do you think people voted Obama for his accomplishments and fabulous political past.
If you don't want to feed the woke censor (that also likes to block VPN connections), I uploaded the Trump interview to a Blossom server:
https://cdn.satellite.earth/3881320a2387c5a020719f273bda98e8758d42d0916fab1ac819966a4847313b.mp4
MAYBE JOE ROGAN SHOULD HAVE UPLOADED IT ON NOSTR AMIRITE
shut up. no it is not being shadow banned. that’s fucking retarded to believe that—never mind actually saying it out loud in permanent marker. 😂
but funny thing about joe’s interview.
as much as joe is too [_____] for me for the most part, i appreciate him sometimes like in this interview. in the beginning, joe gave a little test to trump, which trump failed. OF COURSE he failed.
bet all of you fucking retarded trump thumpers missed it.
but the gist of the test that joe rogan devised and gave to trump that trump failed is that trump is a narcissistic utterly delusional psychopath who is also already in the midst of actual dementia/alzheimers.
It is.
I searched for:
Trump
Trump Joe Rogan
Joe Rogan
No interview.
Only way to get to it, is by directly going through the JR channel.
Thank you for not being retarded like the retard above.
bitcoin brothers❔❔
fellows of humanity❕❕
i beseech you both to
pahleeeeaaassseee
follow the path of
✨enlightenment✨
and seek
T R U T H ‼️
✨
🤲
🧡💜🤙🖖🫶
I'm just running across this, but yeah, it's definitely being squashed. I was stripping the audio out last night and downloading a copy because I couldn't get back to it. Rogan's whole channel doesn't show up in search without typing the full name.
I posted the audio last night if you want to save it.
Yes it is moron.
On X, I saw multiple people asking Elon to create a search engine that doesn't censor: LOL
As if alternatives like Brave doesn't exists. SMH.
It got like 22 million views. If they were trying to censor it, I'm not sure they were very successful.
It would have 100 million + if they weren’t censoring it from search.
That's quite the conjecture. What are you basing that on?
Conjecture? Those are typical views for a Mr beast video. It’s not that hard for a YouTube trending video to get to a hundred million. This is the most cultural relevant and iconic podcast episode in history. It’s got 1/3 of that while being shadow banned in search on both YouTube and google. It’s not conjecture. It would easily be 100+
First two days on Spotify it wasn’t on home page. You had to search for it, even on Spotify. Definite shadowban
Well, it is conjecture if don't have an empirical basis to justify the numbers. But I certainly accept the basis you've provided for your conjecture. It's possible that it would have gotten 100 million views if not for the censorship you claim. But you can't conflate your conjecture and assumptions with objective fact. Simply claiming it would have gotten 100 million views, and pointing to some other popular channel that gets 100 million views is not a basis for asserting it as a fact.
You see what you want to see.
You can't fathom that Goog doesn't align with Trump?
You can't imagine that they boost content they like and dampen content they don't?
Seriously?
Wow, that's an amazing extrapolation from the basic question I actually asked. I'm gonna get you a Jump to Conclusions mat for Christmas. Making an empirical assertion demands supporting evidence. A specific number was thrown out, and I'm just asking for the empirical basis for that number. Is it based on any data? Or is it just some large number that was plucked out of the air?
Bro you posting a youtube link on nostr, this wont save the podcast...
I downloaded the video in 144p and the audio in 48kbps.
I cant post on nostr because of a MB limit.
If anyone wants the video/audio dm me
no one still thinks youtube is neutral. what makes you say they're shadow banning it?